View Full Version : oh dear god....Bin Laden's love child is on RD!!!!
soulflyer
December 8th, 2004, 09:21 PM
http://www.ratedesi.com/view.php?i=66186
This chick and her sister are fucking stupid....i swear they must have some serious issues - cuz thats the only thing to explain their extremity!
gabroo_shakeen
December 8th, 2004, 09:23 PM
Yea thas messed up...they should keep their political views to themselves instead of advertising them on RD.
Amberosia
December 8th, 2004, 09:25 PM
to each his own.
YANYANspokesgyal
December 8th, 2004, 09:29 PM
She's beautiful :oops:
absolutbrownguy
December 8th, 2004, 09:30 PM
thats a lil harsh
Cunard
December 8th, 2004, 09:31 PM
perfect example of somone who should be deported
soulflyer
December 8th, 2004, 09:31 PM
She's beautiful :oops:
Yeah she is - but that about as afr as the attraction goes. her millitant ass needs to be taught a lesson to respect other religions.
mr neo
December 8th, 2004, 09:32 PM
perfect example of somone who should be deported
got_it_twisted
December 8th, 2004, 09:59 PM
Yeah she is - but that about as afr as the attraction goes. her millitant ass needs to be taught a lesson to respect other religions.
Where exactly is she disrespecting other religions?
I dont c wot the fuss is? Someone care to explain?
Amberosia
December 8th, 2004, 10:02 PM
the israeli flag isn a religion...
dj XeNo
December 8th, 2004, 10:13 PM
awesome pic of the israeli flag burning.
Cunard
December 9th, 2004, 02:07 AM
awesome pic of the israeli flag burning.
awsome to see the US flag flying over Iraq and Afghanistan :wink:
bigbobs
December 9th, 2004, 02:20 AM
I didn't read her or her sister's profiles too carefully, so maybe I missed something, but I didnt see anything too offensive? Please be more specific about what you're referring to as being offensive.
bigbobs
December 9th, 2004, 02:23 AM
If it's the flag burning thing--I dont think that's a big deal--she's not attacking any religion, just flags of countries which she disagrees with on foreign policy issues.
Likewise, I'm Pakistani, but I wouldn't really care if I saw someone from India burning a flag of Pakistan. I would, however, get offended if someone was ridiculing a Qur'an. The difference is the latter is a religious symbol, the former political. The sisters are not ridiculing a Bible or Torah.
Cunard
December 9th, 2004, 05:57 AM
her profile ahs nothing to do with religion, but her being happy at the burning of flags just causes tension, live in the west as a citizen, not as somone who gets joy from causing even more tension between the muslims and the rest. pertty simple concept
r-town_chickee
December 9th, 2004, 06:02 AM
its freedom of expression. our rights are already being infringed upon -any "extremist" action can be seen as a result of the situation at hand. don't cast her down b/c she's assertive and bold - at least she can speak her mind.
Cunard
December 9th, 2004, 06:09 AM
its freedom of expression. our rights are already being infringed upon -any "extremist" action can be seen as a result of the situation at hand. don't cast her down b/c she's assertive and bold - at least she can speak her mind.
expressing your discontent with a nations policy is one thing, but posting a pic of a flag with chants of death to israel, death to america and being happy about it crosses the line in my view, cause that just cause friction
r-town_chickee
December 9th, 2004, 06:17 AM
its freedom of expression. our rights are already being infringed upon -any "extremist" action can be seen as a result of the situation at hand. don't cast her down b/c she's assertive and bold - at least she can speak her mind.
expressing your discontent with a nations policy is one thing, but posting a pic of a flag with chants of death to israel, death to america and being happy about it crosses the line in my view, cause that just cause friction
if she's causing friction, that's her problem. causing friction also has nothing to do with the freedom of expression in this case. technically, i don't believe there is any law that forbids a person from expressing the things she does - even as violently as she chooses to do. personally, i wouldn't express myself the way she has - but to each his/her own. under the "democratic" law, you can't tell a person that he/she is wrong for expressing an opinion because it causes tension...
Cunard
December 9th, 2004, 06:39 AM
its freedom of expression. our rights are already being infringed upon -any "extremist" action can be seen as a result of the situation at hand. don't cast her down b/c she's assertive and bold - at least she can speak her mind.
expressing your discontent with a nations policy is one thing, but posting a pic of a flag with chants of death to israel, death to america and being happy about it crosses the line in my view, cause that just cause friction
if she's causing friction, that's her problem. causing friction also has nothing to do with the freedom of expression in this case. technically, i don't believe there is any law that forbids a person from expressing the things she does - even as violently as she chooses to do. personally, i wouldn't express myself the way she has - but to each his/her own. under the "democratic" law, you can't tell a person that he/she is wrong for expressing an opinion because it causes tension...
ummm, can i go out and call for the death of black people? no, every nation has a set of rules that u must follow, without structure, things would fall apart, even in a democratic one.
Supporting the call of Death to Israel/Death to America breaks those rules,
people like that should be deported, they dont like the west, why should they live here
:?
slightly_toasted
December 9th, 2004, 10:10 AM
dont hate long live falistine :twisted:
slightly_toasted
December 9th, 2004, 10:11 AM
death to Isreal boo hoo :twisted:
ilikecheese
December 9th, 2004, 10:12 AM
http://www.ratedesi.com/view.php?i=66186
This chick and her sister are fucking stupid....i swear they must have some serious issues - cuz thats the only thing to explain their extremity!haha i did her sister XD
their extremity? what extremity r u talking about? its not as bad as the other 1 i bitched at
slightly_toasted
December 9th, 2004, 10:14 AM
its freedom of expression. our rights are already being infringed upon -any "extremist" action can be seen as a result of the situation at hand. don't cast her down b/c she's assertive and bold - at least she can speak her mind.
expressing your discontent with a nations policy is one thing, but posting a pic of a flag with chants of death to israel, death to america and being happy about it crosses the line in my view, cause that just cause friction
if she's causing friction, that's her problem. causing friction also has nothing to do with the freedom of expression in this case. technically, i don't believe there is any law that forbids a person from expressing the things she does - even as violently as she chooses to do. personally, i wouldn't express myself the way she has - but to each his/her own. under the "democratic" law, you can't tell a person that he/she is wrong for expressing an opinion because it causes tension...
ummm, can i go out and call for the death of black people? no, every nation has a set of rules that u must follow, without structure, things would fall apart, even in a democratic one.
Supporting the call of Death to Israel/Death to America breaks those rules,
people like that should be deported, they dont like the west, why should they live here
:?
YEa YOU CAN DONT YOU SEE THE KKK DOES IT its call the freedom of expression
Geezer
December 9th, 2004, 10:32 AM
the israeli flag isn a religion...
But the star represents Zionism which opposes anti-semitism and semitism is a predisposition in favor of Jews. So it does have a religious undertone.
hey_itz_ray
December 9th, 2004, 10:51 AM
its freedom of expression. our rights are already being infringed upon -any "extremist" action can be seen as a result of the situation at hand. don't cast her down b/c she's assertive and bold - at least she can speak her mind.
expressing your discontent with a nations policy is one thing, but posting a pic of a flag with chants of death to israel, death to america and being happy about it crosses the line in my view, cause that just cause friction
if she's causing friction, that's her problem. causing friction also has nothing to do with the freedom of expression in this case. technically, i don't believe there is any law that forbids a person from expressing the things she does - even as violently as she chooses to do. personally, i wouldn't express myself the way she has - but to each his/her own. under the "democratic" law, you can't tell a person that he/she is wrong for expressing an opinion because it causes tension...
ummm, can i go out and call for the death of black people? no, every nation has a set of rules that u must follow, without structure, things would fall apart, even in a democratic one.
Supporting the call of Death to Israel/Death to America breaks those rules,
people like that should be deported, they dont like the west, why should they live here
:?
YEa YOU CAN DONT YOU SEE THE KKK DOES IT its call the freedom of expression
i think daz inappropriate tho..sum isrealis can b in diz site that getz offended...all dat falg burnin shitcauses all these drama...y start it in the first place right?....i think she should respect all countries/religions wutevr
ilikecheese
December 9th, 2004, 10:52 AM
think its inappropriate ? ugly? messed up? u know what? NO 1 GIVES A SHITTT! for every1 of u that hate it, theres like other who thinks its funny, and for every1 that thinks its funny theres people could think its alright, and for every1 who think its blah.. there are people THAT COULD GIVE A SHIT, me being 1
hey_itz_ray
December 9th, 2004, 11:14 AM
chill cheesy...dont melt lolz
pachaas Paisa
December 9th, 2004, 11:24 AM
In All of These Myths, I Have Always Been Voiceless,
When The TRUTH Is So Much Louder!
^^^ :scratch:
easy people shes just expressing her opinion im sure she's a nice girl
dj XeNo
December 9th, 2004, 11:30 AM
awesome pic of the israeli flag burning.
awsome to see the US flag flying over Iraq and Afghanistan :wink:
not really, i think it would be better to see the iraqi flag flying over our soil.
soulflyer
December 9th, 2004, 01:20 PM
To those people who decided to post on here without seeing her page properly, or her sisters...
Her and her sister are supporters of bin laden, both are arabs, and both have extremists for boyfriends/hubbys...
It is both religious and political. The burning of the flag is not only political, it is also religious. The fight over palestime is a religious one as well as a political one, hence it's severity.
And as for the chick who said she's being bold and assertive...That dont mean shit, so that means next time hitler should be given credit for being bold and assertive?! :roll:
statix
December 9th, 2004, 01:46 PM
its freedom of expression. our rights are already being infringed upon -any "extremist" action can be seen as a result of the situation at hand. don't cast her down b/c she's assertive and bold - at least she can speak her mind.
expressing your discontent with a nations policy is one thing, but posting a pic of a flag with chants of death to israel, death to america and being happy about it crosses the line in my view, cause that just cause friction
if she's causing friction, that's her problem. causing friction also has nothing to do with the freedom of expression in this case. technically, i don't believe there is any law that forbids a person from expressing the things she does - even as violently as she chooses to do. personally, i wouldn't express myself the way she has - but to each his/her own. under the "democratic" law, you can't tell a person that he/she is wrong for expressing an opinion because it causes tension...
ummm, can i go out and call for the death of black people? no, every nation has a set of rules that u must follow, without structure, things would fall apart, even in a democratic one.
Supporting the call of Death to Israel/Death to America breaks those rules,
people like that should be deported, they dont like the west, why should they live here
:?
uh of course you can especially in a country which strongly advocates freedom of speech and has laws in place that give people considerable leeway in expressing their opinions..due process law constrains the goverments power in prosecuting people who allegedly call for the death of black people i.e. kkk or other white power groups...so long as they keep themselves within the confines and cornerstone of common law (by not conspiring, showing intent of, or plotting to kill black people ) they can continue exploiting the principals embedded under the first and fifth amendment
mr$ lloyd bank$
December 9th, 2004, 01:57 PM
To those people who decided to post on here without seeing her page properly, or her sisters...
Her and her sister are supporters of bin laden, both are arabs, and both have extremists for boyfriends/hubbys...
It is both religious and political. The burning of the flag is not only political, it is also religious. The fight over palestime is a religious one as well as a political one, hence it's severity.
And as for the chick who said she's being bold and assertive...That dont mean shit, so that means next time hitler should be given credit for being bold and assertive?! :roll:
Im laughin ma azz off right now.. hahahahaha
Me and ma sista r arabs??? haha.. But thanx 4 da compliment!
Our hubbies r extremists ??? U dont even know them! r they extremists, cuz they r muslims or what r u sayin??? Your judgin from da pics of them!!!
All I can say is dat me and ma gorgeous sista r strong muslim women, who say whatever we want and whenever we want! We come from Denmark.. And if u know anythin about this country, u know dat what we do aint illegal!!! This country aint like America!!!!
We have an opition about Palestine, cuz our brothas and sistas r gettin killed. And who r killin them??? USA AND ISRAEL!!! We neva said dat we hate all da jews in da world. We only hate da jews, who r against us!!!
END OF DISCUSSION !!!!!!!!!
Im out!!!!!!!!!!!
// Jamilah
thanatoski
December 9th, 2004, 01:59 PM
To those people who decided to post on here without seeing her page properly, or her sisters...
Her and her sister are supporters of bin laden, both are arabs, and both have extremists for boyfriends/hubbys...
It is both religious and political. The burning of the flag is not only political, it is also religious. The fight over palestime is a religious one as well as a political one, hence it's severity.
And as for the chick who said she's being bold and assertive...That dont mean shit, so that means next time hitler should be given credit for being bold and assertive?! :roll:
Im laughin ma azz off right now.. hahahahaha
Me and ma sista r arabs??? haha.. But thanx 4 da compliment!
Our hubbies r extremists ??? U dont even know them! r they extremists, cuz they r muslims or what r u sayin??? Your judgin from da pics of them!!!
All I can say is dat me and ma gorgeous sista r strong muslim women, who say whatever we want and whenever we want! We come from Denmark.. And if u know anythin about this country, u know dat what we do aint illegal!!! This country aint like America!!!!
We have an opition about Palestine, cuz our brothas and sistas r gettin killed. And who r killin them??? USA AND ISRAEL!!! We neva said dat we hate all da jews in da world. We only hate da jews, who r against us!!!
END OF DISCUSSION !!!!!!!!!
Im out!!!!!!!!!!!
// Jamilah
your "brothers and sisters" are dying not only in palestine but in parts of Asia and Africa... why not do something productive and support their right to fresh water, food, basic hygeine? Maybe if you weren't such a attention whore, you would realize that there are problems other then palestine/israel.....
mr$ lloyd bank$
December 9th, 2004, 02:03 PM
your "brothers and sisters" are dying not only in palestine but in parts of Asia and Africa... why not do something productive and support their right to fresh water, food, basic hygeine? Maybe if you weren't such a attention whore, you would realize that there are problems other then palestine/israel.....
u dont know what i did 4 da muslims around da world, so shut da f**k up!!!
Attention whore? hahahaha... I dont ask 4 da attention.. I just get it!
ilikecheese
December 9th, 2004, 02:04 PM
your "brothers and sisters" are dying not only in palestine but in parts of Asia and Africa... why not do something productive and support their right to fresh water, food, basic hygeine? Maybe if you weren't such a attention whore, you would realize that there are problems other then palestine/israel.....
u dont know what i did 4 da muslims around da world, so shut da f**k up!!!
Attention whore? hahahaha... I dont ask 4 da attention.. I just get it!cuz shes soooo freaking fine people ;)
thanatoski
December 9th, 2004, 02:06 PM
your "brothers and sisters" are dying not only in palestine but in parts of Asia and Africa... why not do something productive and support their right to fresh water, food, basic hygeine? Maybe if you weren't such a attention whore, you would realize that there are problems other then palestine/israel.....
u dont know what i did 4 da muslims around da world, so shut da f**k up!!!
Attention whore? hahahaha... I dont ask 4 da attention.. I just get it!
imma call the fbi on yo terrorist ass
mr$ lloyd bank$
December 9th, 2004, 02:09 PM
imma call the fbi on yo terrorist ass
FBI???? Hahahahaha... I always wanted 2 visit Guantanamo.. And now i can get a free trip... hahahaha
thanatoski
December 9th, 2004, 02:10 PM
imma call the fbi on yo terrorist ass
FBI???? Hahahahaha... I always wanted 2 visit Guantanamo.. And now i can get a free trip... hahahaha
but seriously you support the cause so much why not go blow yourself up or join the front lines??
mr$ lloyd bank$
December 9th, 2004, 02:13 PM
i think daz inappropriate tho..sum isrealis can b in diz site that getz offended...all dat falg burnin shitcauses all these drama...y start it in the first place right?....i think she should respect all countries/religions wutevr
Ma sista hasrespect 4 all religions... So keep your mouth shut, cuz u dont know what ya talkin about
reaz
December 9th, 2004, 02:13 PM
imma call the fbi on yo terrorist ass
FBI???? Hahahahaha... I always wanted 2 visit Guantanamo.. And now i can get a free trip... hahahaha
but seriously you support the cause so much why not go blow yourself up or join the front lines??
well, we dont know her. who knows what she does for her cause. i doubt either you or I have the right to provide options without knowing her.
mr$ lloyd bank$
December 9th, 2004, 02:14 PM
imma call the fbi on yo terrorist ass
FBI???? Hahahahaha... I always wanted 2 visit Guantanamo.. And now i can get a free trip... hahahaha
but seriously you support the cause so much why not go blow yourself up or join the front lines??
I wanna do sumthing worse
Cunard
December 9th, 2004, 04:59 PM
Like i said before, this is a great example of where people need to be deported. Since Danish troops are in Iraq, and she has said that she wants to do somthing worse than even a suicide bombing.....
absolutbrownguy
December 9th, 2004, 05:01 PM
:no:
absolutbrownguy
December 9th, 2004, 05:06 PM
man this is sad.
HeRsHeE317
December 9th, 2004, 05:08 PM
http://www.ratedesi.com/view.php?i=66186
This chick and her sister are fucking stupid....i swear they must have some serious issues - cuz thats the only thing to explain their extremity!
iam leeve her a lil comment
HeRsHeE317
December 9th, 2004, 05:13 PM
done
:D
mr$ lloyd bank$
December 9th, 2004, 05:16 PM
Like i said before, this is a great example of where people need to be deported. Since Danish troops are in Iraq, and she has said that she wants to do somthing worse than even a suicide bombing.....
Still laughin ma azz off!!!
absolutbrownguy
December 9th, 2004, 05:16 PM
i could wear a hijab wanan see?
HeRsHeE317
December 9th, 2004, 05:18 PM
i could wear a hijab wanan see?
:yes:
absolutbrownguy
December 9th, 2004, 05:18 PM
lol later tonight
HeRsHeE317
December 9th, 2004, 05:19 PM
lol later tonight
:(
absolutbrownguy
December 9th, 2004, 05:20 PM
lol just go look at my thread which i copied khushi i wore a duppatta over me head and all lol
Cunard
December 9th, 2004, 05:22 PM
Like i said before, this is a great example of where people need to be deported. Since Danish troops are in Iraq, and she has said that she wants to do somthing worse than even a suicide bombing.....
Still laughin ma azz off!!!
laugh all u want, its good for u....but the thing remains that most people are laughing at u for being a hypocrite who knows little about her own faith and just does what she hears of Al-Manar
HeRsHeE317
December 9th, 2004, 05:22 PM
lol just go look at my thread which i copied khushi i wore a duppatta over me head and all lol
linky!!!!
:mrhappy:
absolutbrownguy
December 9th, 2004, 05:25 PM
http://forums.ratedesi.com/viewtopic.php?t=38014
mr$ lloyd bank$
December 9th, 2004, 05:27 PM
Like i said before, this is a great example of where people need to be deported. Since Danish troops are in Iraq, and she has said that she wants to do somthing worse than even a suicide bombing.....
Still laughin ma azz off!!!
laugh all u want, its good for u....but the thing remains that most people are laughing at u for being a hypocrite who knows little about her own faith and just does what she hears of Al-Manar
Hope your not a muslim...
mr neo
December 9th, 2004, 05:28 PM
^ LOLOLOL
HeRsHeE317
December 9th, 2004, 05:30 PM
http://forums.ratedesi.com/viewtopic.php?t=38014
aww how cute!!!
:hug:
absolutbrownguy
December 9th, 2004, 05:31 PM
http://forums.ratedesi.com/viewtopic.php?t=38014
aww how cute!!!
:hug:
:shakefis: lol
bigbobs
December 9th, 2004, 05:57 PM
Like i said before, this is a great example of where people need to be deported. Since Danish troops are in Iraq, and she has said that she wants to do somthing worse than even a suicide bombing.....
Since when has disagreeing with the government's policies of a nation where you reside in been justification for deportation? I guess everyone who voted for Kerry and hate Bush's policies need to get deported from the U.S. now becuase they hate Bush's policies or aren't allowed to express their hate? I guess the writer of Farenheight 9/11 should have been sent to Guantanemo Bay months ago!
Their profiles are not attacking any individual on this forum or anyone's religion. Those who are getting offended are only so because they support the foreign policies of the nations she's criticizing.
Cunard
December 9th, 2004, 06:02 PM
they support violence and support terrorists.
Supporters of Kerry didnt support violence and didnt go join bin laden cause Bush won.
if u think suicide bombing is the right way of disagreeing, then you need to get yourself back to the third world
Cunard
December 9th, 2004, 06:04 PM
Like i said before, this is a great example of where people need to be deported. Since Danish troops are in Iraq, and she has said that she wants to do somthing worse than even a suicide bombing.....
Still laughin ma azz off!!!
laugh all u want, its good for u....but the thing remains that most people are laughing at u for being a hypocrite who knows little about her own faith and just does what she hears of Al-Manar
Hope your not a muslim...
im not, i do hold an israeli passport though :wink:
ghettofabulous
December 9th, 2004, 06:06 PM
stfu....yall are hating cuz she's muslim...and israel is a terroist state and she has the right to put on any political pictures on this site.... stop hating cuz shes wearing the scarf and its her choice to be on a rating site, if there was a hindu girl putting bharat natyam or sumthin pics on this site nobody would say nuthin...so stfu and let the girl do her thing...
FREE PALESTINE!!!
mr$ lloyd bank$
December 9th, 2004, 06:07 PM
they support violence and support terrorists.
Supporters of Kerry didnt support violence and didnt go join bin laden cause Bush won.
if u think suicide bombing is the right way of disagreeing, then you need to get yourself back to the third world
Me and ma sista neva said dat we supported terrorists... u said dat!!!
ghettofabulous
December 9th, 2004, 06:07 PM
and whats up with saying Bin Laden's love child... !!
She's following her religion and she dislikes Israel (which 99.99% of Muslims do)....
Palestine's Freedom and Al Qaeda are two different things
bigbobs
December 9th, 2004, 06:11 PM
they support violence and support terrorists.
Supporters of Kerry didnt support violence and didnt go join bin laden cause Bush won.
if u think suicide bombing is the right way of disagreeing, then you need to get yourself back to the third world
Where on their profiles are they supporting terrorists? If hating U.S. and Israeli foreign policy makes one a terrorist, I guess I am too! As well as millions of other Americans and Israelis!
Her suicide bomb remark was obviously just trying to touch your nerves, since the thread was already reduced to personal attacks.
But anyway, what's the difference between suicide bombing a soldier and killing 5-10 civilians as compared to dropping a 2,000 lb on a civilian population due to "intelligence" that a wanted target may be among the civilian population, and killing approx. 100 civilians in the attack? Much much more civilian casualties have resulted from American attacks than those of the "insurgents."
ghettofabulous
December 9th, 2004, 06:13 PM
Like i said before, this is a great example of where people need to be deported. Since Danish troops are in Iraq, and she has said that she wants to do somthing worse than even a suicide bombing.....
Since when has disagreeing with the government's policies of a nation where you reside in been justification for deportation? I guess everyone who voted for Kerry and hate Bush's policies need to get deported from the U.S. now becuase they hate Bush's policies or aren't allowed to express their hate? I guess the writer of Farenheight 9/11 should have been sent to Guantanemo Bay months ago!
Their profiles are not attacking any individual on this forum or anyone's religion. Those who are getting offended are only so because they support the foreign policies of the nations she's criticizing.
Fact: he's saying that cuz his dad worked for Israel's army! and he does not associate Israel with what it is...State sponsered terrorism
Cunard
December 9th, 2004, 06:16 PM
they support violence and support terrorists.
Supporters of Kerry didnt support violence and didnt go join bin laden cause Bush won.
if u think suicide bombing is the right way of disagreeing, then you need to get yourself back to the third world
Where on their profiles are they supporting terrorists? If hating U.S. and Israeli foreign policy makes one a terrorist, I guess I am too! As well as millions of other Americans and Israelis!
Her suicide bomb remark was obviously just trying to touch your nerves, since the thread was already reduced to personal attacks.
But anyway, what's the difference between suicide bombing a soldier and killing 5-10 civilians as compared to dropping a 2,000 lb on a civilian population due to "intelligence" that a wanted target may be among the civilian population, and killing approx. 100 civilians in the attack? Much much more civilian casualties have resulted from American attacks than those of the "insurgents."
insurgents have killed more than US air strikes, iraqi polic force has suffured over 2 thousand casualties
suicide bombings are directed at civilians on purpose, air strikes are directed at militants, if u see no difference your blind
ii_khushi86_ii
December 9th, 2004, 06:19 PM
perfect example of double standard... :no: guys have put up extremist pics like that flag-burning and anything else on her site... THEY were bashed to the fullest and later, banned.... she does it, and half of you are like, "she`s just voicing her opinion.. and she`s fine!" :no: :no:
Cunard
December 9th, 2004, 06:19 PM
they support violence and support terrorists.
Supporters of Kerry didnt support violence and didnt go join bin laden cause Bush won.
if u think suicide bombing is the right way of disagreeing, then you need to get yourself back to the third world
Me and ma sista neva said dat we supported terrorists... u said dat!!!
u have posted a picture with hamas terrorists burning flags :?
ghettofabulous
December 9th, 2004, 06:19 PM
they support violence and support terrorists.
Supporters of Kerry didnt support violence and didnt go join bin laden cause Bush won.
if u think suicide bombing is the right way of disagreeing, then you need to get yourself back to the third world
Where on their profiles are they supporting terrorists? If hating U.S. and Israeli foreign policy makes one a terrorist, I guess I am too! As well as millions of other Americans and Israelis!
Her suicide bomb remark was obviously just trying to touch your nerves, since the thread was already reduced to personal attacks.
But anyway, what's the difference between suicide bombing a soldier and killing 5-10 civilians as compared to dropping a 2,000 lb on a civilian population due to "intelligence" that a wanted target may be among the civilian population, and killing approx. 100 civilians in the attack? Much much more civilian casualties have resulted from American attacks than those of the "insurgents."
insurgents have killed more than US air strikes, iraqi polic force has suffured over 2 thousand casualties
suicide bombings are directed at civilians on purpose, air strikes are directed at militants, if u see no difference your blind
air strikes directed on militants in the middle of urban areas is stupid.... Civilians DIE!
mr$ lloyd bank$
December 9th, 2004, 06:20 PM
they support violence and support terrorists.
Supporters of Kerry didnt support violence and didnt go join bin laden cause Bush won.
if u think suicide bombing is the right way of disagreeing, then you need to get yourself back to the third world
Where on their profiles are they supporting terrorists? If hating U.S. and Israeli foreign policy makes one a terrorist, I guess I am too! As well as millions of other Americans and Israelis!
Her suicide bomb remark was obviously just trying to touch your nerves, since the thread was already reduced to personal attacks.
But anyway, what's the difference between suicide bombing a soldier and killing 5-10 civilians as compared to dropping a 2,000 lb on a civilian population due to "intelligence" that a wanted target may be among the civilian population, and killing approx. 100 civilians in the attack? Much much more civilian casualties have resulted from American attacks than those of the "insurgents."
insurgents have killed more than US air strikes, iraqi polic force has suffured over 2 thousand casualties
suicide bombings are directed at civilians on purpose, air strikes are directed at militants, if u see no difference your blind
Im just wonderin... Does Bushs shit taste like chocolate? Cuz it sounds like your lickin his azz right now!!!
bigbobs
December 9th, 2004, 06:20 PM
they support violence and support terrorists.
Supporters of Kerry didnt support violence and didnt go join bin laden cause Bush won.
if u think suicide bombing is the right way of disagreeing, then you need to get yourself back to the third world
Where on their profiles are they supporting terrorists? If hating U.S. and Israeli foreign policy makes one a terrorist, I guess I am too! As well as millions of other Americans and Israelis!
Her suicide bomb remark was obviously just trying to touch your nerves, since the thread was already reduced to personal attacks.
But anyway, what's the difference between suicide bombing a soldier and killing 5-10 civilians as compared to dropping a 2,000 lb on a civilian population due to "intelligence" that a wanted target may be among the civilian population, and killing approx. 100 civilians in the attack? Much much more civilian casualties have resulted from American attacks than those of the "insurgents."
insurgents have killed more than US air strikes, iraqi polic force has suffured over 2 thousand casualties
suicide bombings are directed at civilians on purpose, air strikes are directed at militants, if u see no difference your blind
Iraqi police force are not considered as "civilians" by all, since they work for the U.S. For arguments sake, even if they were, two thousand is peanuts compared to the # of civilians killed by U.S. forces (over 100,000 since the recent war, and over 1,000,000 during the decade of sanctions prior to it) http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99996596
Cunard
December 9th, 2004, 06:21 PM
they support violence and support terrorists.
Supporters of Kerry didnt support violence and didnt go join bin laden cause Bush won.
if u think suicide bombing is the right way of disagreeing, then you need to get yourself back to the third world
Where on their profiles are they supporting terrorists? If hating U.S. and Israeli foreign policy makes one a terrorist, I guess I am too! As well as millions of other Americans and Israelis!
Her suicide bomb remark was obviously just trying to touch your nerves, since the thread was already reduced to personal attacks.
But anyway, what's the difference between suicide bombing a soldier and killing 5-10 civilians as compared to dropping a 2,000 lb on a civilian population due to "intelligence" that a wanted target may be among the civilian population, and killing approx. 100 civilians in the attack? Much much more civilian casualties have resulted from American attacks than those of the "insurgents."
insurgents have killed more than US air strikes, iraqi polic force has suffured over 2 thousand casualties
suicide bombings are directed at civilians on purpose, air strikes are directed at militants, if u see no difference your blind
air strikes directed on militants in the middle of urban areas is stupid.... Civilians DIE!
thats why the militants hide in dense civilian areas, they know the US army is coming no matter what, so this way civilians die causing the US even more problems
mr$ lloyd bank$
December 9th, 2004, 06:22 PM
they support violence and support terrorists.
Supporters of Kerry didnt support violence and didnt go join bin laden cause Bush won.
if u think suicide bombing is the right way of disagreeing, then you need to get yourself back to the third world
Me and ma sista neva said dat we supported terrorists... u said dat!!!
u have posted a picture with hamas terrorists burning flags :?
Hamas r NOT terrorists!!!! Israel r da terrorists!! Their damn leader SHARON got terrorist written all over his ugly face!!!
And why r u talkin about Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden all da time huh?
bigbobs
December 9th, 2004, 06:23 PM
they support violence and support terrorists.
Supporters of Kerry didnt support violence and didnt go join bin laden cause Bush won.
if u think suicide bombing is the right way of disagreeing, then you need to get yourself back to the third world
Where on their profiles are they supporting terrorists? If hating U.S. and Israeli foreign policy makes one a terrorist, I guess I am too! As well as millions of other Americans and Israelis!
Her suicide bomb remark was obviously just trying to touch your nerves, since the thread was already reduced to personal attacks.
But anyway, what's the difference between suicide bombing a soldier and killing 5-10 civilians as compared to dropping a 2,000 lb on a civilian population due to "intelligence" that a wanted target may be among the civilian population, and killing approx. 100 civilians in the attack? Much much more civilian casualties have resulted from American attacks than those of the "insurgents."
insurgents have killed more than US air strikes, iraqi polic force has suffured over 2 thousand casualties
suicide bombings are directed at civilians on purpose, air strikes are directed at militants, if u see no difference your blind
air strikes directed on militants in the middle of urban areas is stupid.... Civilians DIE!
thats why the militants hide in dense civilian areas, they know the US army is coming no matter what, so this way civilians die causing the US even more problems
Using that logic one can argue that since some American soldiers were doing their thing in the world trade center on 9/11 they were hiding in a civilian population and thus caused Al Qaeda more problems
bigbobs
December 9th, 2004, 06:25 PM
they support violence and support terrorists.
Supporters of Kerry didnt support violence and didnt go join bin laden cause Bush won.
if u think suicide bombing is the right way of disagreeing, then you need to get yourself back to the third world
Where on their profiles are they supporting terrorists? If hating U.S. and Israeli foreign policy makes one a terrorist, I guess I am too! As well as millions of other Americans and Israelis!
Her suicide bomb remark was obviously just trying to touch your nerves, since the thread was already reduced to personal attacks.
But anyway, what's the difference between suicide bombing a soldier and killing 5-10 civilians as compared to dropping a 2,000 lb on a civilian population due to "intelligence" that a wanted target may be among the civilian population, and killing approx. 100 civilians in the attack? Much much more civilian casualties have resulted from American attacks than those of the "insurgents."
insurgents have killed more than US air strikes, iraqi polic force has suffured over 2 thousand casualties
suicide bombings are directed at civilians on purpose, air strikes are directed at militants, if u see no difference your blind
So if one is "directed" at a legitimate target any # of civilian casualties is justifiable as collateral damage?
soulflyer
December 9th, 2004, 06:26 PM
hahahahha - never expected the love child to come on here and post...but now she has, here is what i gotta say to you....
this is rateDESI.com not RATE-MY-TERRORIST-ASS.COM
the whole world is one family, everyone is your brither and everyone is your sister, everyone is like your father and everyone is like your sister.
if you have this thinking, then there would be no need to kill anyone.
Cunard
December 9th, 2004, 06:26 PM
they support violence and support terrorists.
Supporters of Kerry didnt support violence and didnt go join bin laden cause Bush won.
if u think suicide bombing is the right way of disagreeing, then you need to get yourself back to the third world
Where on their profiles are they supporting terrorists? If hating U.S. and Israeli foreign policy makes one a terrorist, I guess I am too! As well as millions of other Americans and Israelis!
Her suicide bomb remark was obviously just trying to touch your nerves, since the thread was already reduced to personal attacks.
But anyway, what's the difference between suicide bombing a soldier and killing 5-10 civilians as compared to dropping a 2,000 lb on a civilian population due to "intelligence" that a wanted target may be among the civilian population, and killing approx. 100 civilians in the attack? Much much more civilian casualties have resulted from American attacks than those of the "insurgents."
insurgents have killed more than US air strikes, iraqi polic force has suffured over 2 thousand casualties
suicide bombings are directed at civilians on purpose, air strikes are directed at militants, if u see no difference your blind
Iraqi police force are not considered as "civilians" by all, since they work for the U.S. For arguments sake, even if they were, two thousand is peanuts compared to the # of civilians killed by U.S. forces (over 100,000 since the recent war, and over 1,000,000 during the decade of sanctions prior to it) http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99996596
all saddam had to do was let UN inspectors in, no war would have happened,no sanctions, nothing would have a happened.
as for the 100,000 death toll and 200,000 if faluuja is counted, what a bunch of BS. get your facts for bettere sites such as reuters or AP
falluja had a pop of 300,000......and most left before the invasion, so how did 100,00 thousand die there??
Cunard
December 9th, 2004, 06:27 PM
they support violence and support terrorists.
Supporters of Kerry didnt support violence and didnt go join bin laden cause Bush won.
if u think suicide bombing is the right way of disagreeing, then you need to get yourself back to the third world
Where on their profiles are they supporting terrorists? If hating U.S. and Israeli foreign policy makes one a terrorist, I guess I am too! As well as millions of other Americans and Israelis!
Her suicide bomb remark was obviously just trying to touch your nerves, since the thread was already reduced to personal attacks.
But anyway, what's the difference between suicide bombing a soldier and killing 5-10 civilians as compared to dropping a 2,000 lb on a civilian population due to "intelligence" that a wanted target may be among the civilian population, and killing approx. 100 civilians in the attack? Much much more civilian casualties have resulted from American attacks than those of the "insurgents."
insurgents have killed more than US air strikes, iraqi polic force has suffured over 2 thousand casualties
suicide bombings are directed at civilians on purpose, air strikes are directed at militants, if u see no difference your blind
Im just wonderin... Does Bushs shit taste like chocolate? Cuz it sounds like your lickin his azz right now!!!
tastes like texas beef
soulflyer
December 9th, 2004, 06:27 PM
they support violence and support terrorists.
Supporters of Kerry didnt support violence and didnt go join bin laden cause Bush won.
if u think suicide bombing is the right way of disagreeing, then you need to get yourself back to the third world
Me and ma sista neva said dat we supported terrorists... u said dat!!!
u have posted a picture with hamas terrorists burning flags :?
Hamas r NOT terrorists!!!! Israel r da terrorists!! Their damn leader SHARON got terrorist written all over his ugly face!!!
And why r u talkin about Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden all da time huh?
CUZ YTOU FUCKING HAVE PICTURES OF THEM ON YOUR PAGE YOU RETARD!!!!
bigbobs
December 9th, 2004, 06:29 PM
they support violence and support terrorists.
Supporters of Kerry didnt support violence and didnt go join bin laden cause Bush won.
if u think suicide bombing is the right way of disagreeing, then you need to get yourself back to the third world
Where on their profiles are they supporting terrorists? If hating U.S. and Israeli foreign policy makes one a terrorist, I guess I am too! As well as millions of other Americans and Israelis!
Her suicide bomb remark was obviously just trying to touch your nerves, since the thread was already reduced to personal attacks.
But anyway, what's the difference between suicide bombing a soldier and killing 5-10 civilians as compared to dropping a 2,000 lb on a civilian population due to "intelligence" that a wanted target may be among the civilian population, and killing approx. 100 civilians in the attack? Much much more civilian casualties have resulted from American attacks than those of the "insurgents."
insurgents have killed more than US air strikes, iraqi polic force has suffured over 2 thousand casualties
suicide bombings are directed at civilians on purpose, air strikes are directed at militants, if u see no difference your blind
Iraqi police force are not considered as "civilians" by all, since they work for the U.S. For arguments sake, even if they were, two thousand is peanuts compared to the # of civilians killed by U.S. forces (over 100,000 since the recent war, and over 1,000,000 during the decade of sanctions prior to it) http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99996596
all saddam had to do was let UN inspectors in, no war would have happened,no sanctions, nothing would have a happened.
as for the 100,000 death toll and 200,000 if faluuja is counted, what a bunch of BS. get your facts for bettere sites such as reuters or AP
falluja had a pop of 300,000......and most left before the invasion, so how did 100,00 thousand die there??
How could 200,000 in "faluuja" die when the article says 100,000 have died in all of Iraq? And what kind of a number is 100,00. Get your numbers right and I'll try to respond.
It's easy to dismiss what you don't like to hear as "BS." My main point was that waaay more Iraqi civilians have died in U.S. air strikes than in all suicide bombings ever, since the start of time, so anyone who focuses all their discontent on suicide bombings by Muslims yet supports the invasion in Iraq is arguing that the blood of Iraqis is cheaper than Americans or Israelis.
mr$ lloyd bank$
December 9th, 2004, 06:29 PM
hahahahha - never expected the love child to come on here and post...but now she has, here is what i gotta say to you....
this is rateDESI.com not RATE-MY-TERRORIST-ASS.COM
the whole world is one family, everyone is your brither and everyone is your sister, everyone is like your father and everyone is like your sister.
if you have this thinking, then there would be no need to kill anyone.
Im not killin anyone, so why should i even think like dat???
And i aint no terrorist... I dont care if u call me 1.. Im used 2 it
Cunard
December 9th, 2004, 06:30 PM
they support violence and support terrorists.
Supporters of Kerry didnt support violence and didnt go join bin laden cause Bush won.
if u think suicide bombing is the right way of disagreeing, then you need to get yourself back to the third world
Where on their profiles are they supporting terrorists? If hating U.S. and Israeli foreign policy makes one a terrorist, I guess I am too! As well as millions of other Americans and Israelis!
Her suicide bomb remark was obviously just trying to touch your nerves, since the thread was already reduced to personal attacks.
But anyway, what's the difference between suicide bombing a soldier and killing 5-10 civilians as compared to dropping a 2,000 lb on a civilian population due to "intelligence" that a wanted target may be among the civilian population, and killing approx. 100 civilians in the attack? Much much more civilian casualties have resulted from American attacks than those of the "insurgents."
insurgents have killed more than US air strikes, iraqi polic force has suffured over 2 thousand casualties
suicide bombings are directed at civilians on purpose, air strikes are directed at militants, if u see no difference your blind
air strikes directed on militants in the middle of urban areas is stupid.... Civilians DIE!
thats why the militants hide in dense civilian areas, they know the US army is coming no matter what, so this way civilians die causing the US even more problems
Using that logic one can argue that since some American soldiers were doing their thing in the world trade center on 9/11 they were hiding in a civilian population and thus caused Al Qaeda more problems
what american soliders in the WTC??
Al Qaeda bever claimed they were going after those soilders, they were targeting civilians on purpose cuase it was easy target with could lead to a massive death toll
mr$ lloyd bank$
December 9th, 2004, 06:31 PM
they support violence and support terrorists.
Supporters of Kerry didnt support violence and didnt go join bin laden cause Bush won.
if u think suicide bombing is the right way of disagreeing, then you need to get yourself back to the third world
Me and ma sista neva said dat we supported terrorists... u said dat!!!
u have posted a picture with hamas terrorists burning flags :?
Hamas r NOT terrorists!!!! Israel r da terrorists!! Their damn leader SHARON got terrorist written all over his ugly face!!!
And why r u talkin about Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden all da time huh?
CUZ YTOU FUCKING HAVE PICTURES OF THEM ON YOUR PAGE YOU RETARD!!!!
Hmmm... Theres no pics of Bin Laden or Al-Qaeda on ma page or ma sistas page... r u BLIND??????????????????????????
Cunard
December 9th, 2004, 06:32 PM
they support violence and support terrorists.
Supporters of Kerry didnt support violence and didnt go join bin laden cause Bush won.
if u think suicide bombing is the right way of disagreeing, then you need to get yourself back to the third world
Me and ma sista neva said dat we supported terrorists... u said dat!!!
u have posted a picture with hamas terrorists burning flags :?
Hamas r NOT terrorists!!!! Israel r da terrorists!! Their damn leader SHARON got terrorist written all over his ugly face!!!
And why r u talkin about Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden all da time huh?
i guess as i watched Bus 65 being blown to peices with two good friends inside is not terrorism.
soulflyer
December 9th, 2004, 06:33 PM
hahahahha - never expected the love child to come on here and post...but now she has, here is what i gotta say to you....
this is rateDESI.com not RATE-MY-TERRORIST-ASS.COM
the whole world is one family, everyone is your brither and everyone is your sister, everyone is like your father and everyone is like your sister.
if you have this thinking, then there would be no need to kill anyone.
Im not killin anyone, so why should i even think like dat???
And i aint no terrorist... I dont care if u call me 1.. Im used 2 it
It obviously does affect you, because you seem to think it is okay to play eye for an eye. If someone gets violent, it does not mean you have to be violent too. Islam does not preach to go out and fight people. Only in the Jihad, and trust me - Jihad is faaaaar away. This aint it.
So please, dont say it doesnt affect you, cuz you took the time to read this thread, get offended, sign up to the forums to inhere and write a response....to supposedly "stick up for yourself"....nu uh! you did it cuz you were offended.
IF it really didnt affect you, you woulda laughed it off and not looked at it again....
Cunard
December 9th, 2004, 06:33 PM
they support violence and support terrorists.
Supporters of Kerry didnt support violence and didnt go join bin laden cause Bush won.
if u think suicide bombing is the right way of disagreeing, then you need to get yourself back to the third world
Me and ma sista neva said dat we supported terrorists... u said dat!!!
u have posted a picture with hamas terrorists burning flags :?
Hamas r NOT terrorists!!!! Israel r da terrorists!! Their damn leader SHARON got terrorist written all over his ugly face!!!
And why r u talkin about Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden all da time huh?
CUZ YTOU FUCKING HAVE PICTURES OF THEM ON YOUR PAGE YOU RETARD!!!!
Hmmm... Theres no pics of Bin Laden or Al-Qaeda on ma page or ma sistas page... r u BLIND??????????????????????????
you have a pic of HAMAS....a terrorist group on Denmarks list of terrorist orgs
bigbobs
December 9th, 2004, 06:33 PM
they support violence and support terrorists.
Supporters of Kerry didnt support violence and didnt go join bin laden cause Bush won.
if u think suicide bombing is the right way of disagreeing, then you need to get yourself back to the third world
Where on their profiles are they supporting terrorists? If hating U.S. and Israeli foreign policy makes one a terrorist, I guess I am too! As well as millions of other Americans and Israelis!
Her suicide bomb remark was obviously just trying to touch your nerves, since the thread was already reduced to personal attacks.
But anyway, what's the difference between suicide bombing a soldier and killing 5-10 civilians as compared to dropping a 2,000 lb on a civilian population due to "intelligence" that a wanted target may be among the civilian population, and killing approx. 100 civilians in the attack? Much much more civilian casualties have resulted from American attacks than those of the "insurgents."
insurgents have killed more than US air strikes, iraqi polic force has suffured over 2 thousand casualties
suicide bombings are directed at civilians on purpose, air strikes are directed at militants, if u see no difference your blind
air strikes directed on militants in the middle of urban areas is stupid.... Civilians DIE!
thats why the militants hide in dense civilian areas, they know the US army is coming no matter what, so this way civilians die causing the US even more problems
Using that logic one can argue that since some American soldiers were doing their thing in the world trade center on 9/11 they were hiding in a civilian population and thus caused Al Qaeda more problems
what american soliders in the WTC??
Al Qaeda bever claimed they were going after those soilders, they were targeting civilians on purpose cuase it was easy target with could lead to a massive death toll
So the difference is that U.S. or Israel does not claim that it targets civilians, even though some of their troops do (moreso Israel than U.S.)--and don't say that don't without reading the news first.
My point is that your logic is flawed. You argue that the civilian deaths in Iraq are justified since the attacks were "directed" at insurgents or Saddam, regardless of how many civilian bystandards died in the attacks or how weak the evidence was that insurgents or Saddam were among civilian populations. Using your logic one can argue that an attack on a civilian population in Israel or America is justified even if you have reason to believe that one soldier may be among a group of crowded civilians.
bigbobs
December 9th, 2004, 06:35 PM
i guess as i watched Bus 65 being blown to peices with two good friends inside is not terrorism.
If you only shared an ounce of that sympathy towards civilians killed on the other side.
ghettofabulous
December 9th, 2004, 06:35 PM
STOP FUCKING HATING !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!
HAVENT YOU FUCKING HEARD OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION!! Now that's what I call a double standard... You guys want to spread "democracy" around the world through bloodshed...but when one Muslim girl post one pic of Israel's flag getting burned..you freak out...Go kiss some zionist ass. First of all I can stand in my front yard and burn America's flag (which i really wouldn't but i can) because it is my first amendment right...so if i can do that in real life why can she not post one pic.... and threads like "who i'd like to fuck *cough cough* is more offensive than some pic. CHILL OUT PEOPLE!!
mr$ lloyd bank$
December 9th, 2004, 06:35 PM
they support violence and support terrorists.
Supporters of Kerry didnt support violence and didnt go join bin laden cause Bush won.
if u think suicide bombing is the right way of disagreeing, then you need to get yourself back to the third world
Me and ma sista neva said dat we supported terrorists... u said dat!!!
u have posted a picture with hamas terrorists burning flags :?
Hamas r NOT terrorists!!!! Israel r da terrorists!! Their damn leader SHARON got terrorist written all over his ugly face!!!
And why r u talkin about Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden all da time huh?
i guess as i watched Bus 65 being blown to peices with two good friends inside is not terrorism.
Oh im so sorry about your friends... naaaah.. just kiddin.
Cunard
December 9th, 2004, 06:36 PM
So the difference is that U.S. or Israel does not claim that it targets civilians, even though some of their troops do (moreso Israel than U.S.)--and don't say that don't without reading the news first.
My point is that your logic is flawed. You argue that the civilian deaths in Iraq are justified since the attacks were "directed" at insurgents or Saddam, regardless of how many civilian bystandards died in the attacks or how weak the evidence was that insurgents or Saddam were among civilian populations. Using your logic one can argue that an attack on a civilian population in Israel or America is justified even if you have reason to believe that one soldier may be among a group of crowded civilians.
the option of doing nothing such as letting sanctions stand as they were was killing more. to go into iraq and get rid of saddam was the less of two evils.
in war people die, sad but true.
ghettofabulous
December 9th, 2004, 06:37 PM
hahahahha - never expected the love child to come on here and post...but now she has, here is what i gotta say to you....
this is rateDESI.com not RATE-MY-TERRORIST-ASS.COM
the whole world is one family, everyone is your brither and everyone is your sister, everyone is like your father and everyone is like your sister.
if you have this thinking, then there would be no need to kill anyone.
Im not killin anyone, so why should i even think like dat???
And i aint no terrorist... I dont care if u call me 1.. Im used 2 it
It obviously does affect you, because you seem to think it is okay to play eye for an eye. If someone gets violent, it does not mean you have to be violent too. Islam does not preach to go out and fight people. Only in the Jihad, and trust me - Jihad is faaaaar away. This aint it.
So please, dont say it doesnt affect you, cuz you took the time to read this thread, get offended, sign up to the forums to inhere and write a response....to supposedly "stick up for yourself"....nu uh! you did it cuz you were offended.
IF it really didnt affect you, you woulda laughed it off and not looked at it again....
how is flag burning violent....its legitimate protest that they have done for a long time including in America during the anti-VIetnam protests.....
soulflyer
December 9th, 2004, 06:37 PM
they support violence and support terrorists.
Supporters of Kerry didnt support violence and didnt go join bin laden cause Bush won.
if u think suicide bombing is the right way of disagreeing, then you need to get yourself back to the third world
Me and ma sista neva said dat we supported terrorists... u said dat!!!
u have posted a picture with hamas terrorists burning flags :?
Hamas r NOT terrorists!!!! Israel r da terrorists!! Their damn leader SHARON got terrorist written all over his ugly face!!!
And why r u talkin about Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden all da time huh?
i guess as i watched Bus 65 being blown to peices with two good friends inside is not terrorism.
Oh im so sorry about your friends... naaaah.. just kiddin.
terrorism people....
see, psychologically speaking, one persons obsession with something (religion or politics for instance) is a result of deeper insecurities, and hate as a child...
so miss lloyd banks....how was your childhood?
bigbobs
December 9th, 2004, 06:38 PM
So the difference is that U.S. or Israel does not claim that it targets civilians, even though some of their troops do (moreso Israel than U.S.)--and don't say that don't without reading the news first.
My point is that your logic is flawed. You argue that the civilian deaths in Iraq are justified since the attacks were "directed" at insurgents or Saddam, regardless of how many civilian bystandards died in the attacks or how weak the evidence was that insurgents or Saddam were among civilian populations. Using your logic one can argue that an attack on a civilian population in Israel or America is justified even if you have reason to believe that one soldier may be among a group of crowded civilians.
the option of doing nothing such as letting sanctions stand as they were was killing more. to go into iraq and get rid of saddam was the less of two evils.
in war people die, sad but true.
Neither of those evils was necessary.
soulflyer
December 9th, 2004, 06:39 PM
hahahahha - never expected the love child to come on here and post...but now she has, here is what i gotta say to you....
this is rateDESI.com not RATE-MY-TERRORIST-ASS.COM
the whole world is one family, everyone is your brither and everyone is your sister, everyone is like your father and everyone is like your sister.
if you have this thinking, then there would be no need to kill anyone.
Im not killin anyone, so why should i even think like dat???
And i aint no terrorist... I dont care if u call me 1.. Im used 2 it
It obviously does affect you, because you seem to think it is okay to play eye for an eye. If someone gets violent, it does not mean you have to be violent too. Islam does not preach to go out and fight people. Only in the Jihad, and trust me - Jihad is faaaaar away. This aint it.
So please, dont say it doesnt affect you, cuz you took the time to read this thread, get offended, sign up to the forums to inhere and write a response....to supposedly "stick up for yourself"....nu uh! you did it cuz you were offended.
IF it really didnt affect you, you woulda laughed it off and not looked at it again....
how is flag burning violent....its legitimate protest that they have done for a long time including in America during the anti-VIetnam protests.....
I think you forget that this child...was/is a supporter of bin laden and al qaeda...
if this is the result of your so called democracy, then fuck that shit...
Cunard
December 9th, 2004, 06:39 PM
they support violence and support terrorists.
Supporters of Kerry didnt support violence and didnt go join bin laden cause Bush won.
if u think suicide bombing is the right way of disagreeing, then you need to get yourself back to the third world
Me and ma sista neva said dat we supported terrorists... u said dat!!!
u have posted a picture with hamas terrorists burning flags :?
Hamas r NOT terrorists!!!! Israel r da terrorists!! Their damn leader SHARON got terrorist written all over his ugly face!!!
And why r u talkin about Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden all da time huh?
i guess as i watched Bus 65 being blown to peices with two good friends inside is not terrorism.
Oh im so sorry about your friends... naaaah.. just kiddin.
like i said before, with your last line, your not even muslim, you pretend to be.
may alla so mercy to u
mr$ lloyd bank$
December 9th, 2004, 06:41 PM
they support violence and support terrorists.
Supporters of Kerry didnt support violence and didnt go join bin laden cause Bush won.
if u think suicide bombing is the right way of disagreeing, then you need to get yourself back to the third world
Me and ma sista neva said dat we supported terrorists... u said dat!!!
u have posted a picture with hamas terrorists burning flags :?
Hamas r NOT terrorists!!!! Israel r da terrorists!! Their damn leader SHARON got terrorist written all over his ugly face!!!
And why r u talkin about Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden all da time huh?
i guess as i watched Bus 65 being blown to peices with two good friends inside is not terrorism.
Oh im so sorry about your friends... naaaah.. just kiddin.
terrorism people....
see, psychologically speaking, one persons obsession with something (religion or politics for instance) is a result of deeper insecurities, and hate as a child...
so miss lloyd banks....how was your childhood?
Ma childhood???? It was all goooood... Just like ma sistas...
Cunard
December 9th, 2004, 06:41 PM
So the difference is that U.S. or Israel does not claim that it targets civilians, even though some of their troops do (moreso Israel than U.S.)--and don't say that don't without reading the news first.
My point is that your logic is flawed. You argue that the civilian deaths in Iraq are justified since the attacks were "directed" at insurgents or Saddam, regardless of how many civilian bystandards died in the attacks or how weak the evidence was that insurgents or Saddam were among civilian populations. Using your logic one can argue that an attack on a civilian population in Israel or America is justified even if you have reason to believe that one soldier may be among a group of crowded civilians.
the option of doing nothing such as letting sanctions stand as they were was killing more. to go into iraq and get rid of saddam was the less of two evils.
in war people die, sad but true.
Neither of those evils was necessary.
sure they were, Iraq invaded Kuwait and Saudi Arabia and used chemical weapons on his own people, killed Shias and Kurds, payed palestinians militants.
mr$ lloyd bank$
December 9th, 2004, 06:42 PM
they support violence and support terrorists.
Supporters of Kerry didnt support violence and didnt go join bin laden cause Bush won.
if u think suicide bombing is the right way of disagreeing, then you need to get yourself back to the third world
Me and ma sista neva said dat we supported terrorists... u said dat!!!
u have posted a picture with hamas terrorists burning flags :?
Hamas r NOT terrorists!!!! Israel r da terrorists!! Their damn leader SHARON got terrorist written all over his ugly face!!!
And why r u talkin about Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden all da time huh?
i guess as i watched Bus 65 being blown to peices with two good friends inside is not terrorism.
Oh im so sorry about your friends... naaaah.. just kiddin.
like i said before, with your last line, your not even muslim, you pretend to be.
may alla so mercy to u
So now your callin me a kafir???
Im a muslim ALHAMDULILLAH !!!!!!
Cunard
December 9th, 2004, 06:44 PM
i guess as i watched Bus 65 being blown to peices with two good friends inside is not terrorism.
If you only shared an ounce of that sympathy towards civilians killed on the other side.
i did before, my opinions hardened the other way after i saw what muslims were saying
ghettofabulous
December 9th, 2004, 06:46 PM
So the difference is that U.S. or Israel does not claim that it targets civilians, even though some of their troops do (moreso Israel than U.S.)--and don't say that don't without reading the news first.
My point is that your logic is flawed. You argue that the civilian deaths in Iraq are justified since the attacks were "directed" at insurgents or Saddam, regardless of how many civilian bystandards died in the attacks or how weak the evidence was that insurgents or Saddam were among civilian populations. Using your logic one can argue that an attack on a civilian population in Israel or America is justified even if you have reason to believe that one soldier may be among a group of crowded civilians.
the option of doing nothing such as letting sanctions stand as they were was killing more. to go into iraq and get rid of saddam was the less of two evils.
in war people die, sad but true.
Neither of those evils was necessary.
sure they were, Iraq invaded Kuwait and Saudi Arabia and used chemical weapons on his own people, killed Shias and Kurds, payed palestinians militants.
yea the shiah love America so much that they dragged four Americans through the streets and waged an uprising... People arent naturally hateful...events that occur in their lives like a family member being killed by American bombs which lead to them takin up arms.
bigbobs
December 9th, 2004, 06:46 PM
So the difference is that U.S. or Israel does not claim that it targets civilians, even though some of their troops do (moreso Israel than U.S.)--and don't say that don't without reading the news first.
My point is that your logic is flawed. You argue that the civilian deaths in Iraq are justified since the attacks were "directed" at insurgents or Saddam, regardless of how many civilian bystandards died in the attacks or how weak the evidence was that insurgents or Saddam were among civilian populations. Using your logic one can argue that an attack on a civilian population in Israel or America is justified even if you have reason to believe that one soldier may be among a group of crowded civilians.
the option of doing nothing such as letting sanctions stand as they were was killing more. to go into iraq and get rid of saddam was the less of two evils.
in war people die, sad but true.
Neither of those evils was necessary.
sure they were, Iraq invaded Kuwait and Saudi Arabia and used chemical weapons on his own people, killed Shias and Kurds, payed palestinians militants.
We all agree that Saddam was a ruthless leader, but he could have been removed under means that would not cause as much destruction to Iraqi civilians. You need to weigh whether the benefit of having him removed is greater than the loss of life to the Iraqi people. You can't answer that, neither can I, nor CNN, FOX, etc. but the Iraqi people themselves. The fact that most Iraqis are supporting the insurgents suggest they disagree with how he was removed from power.
Cunard
December 9th, 2004, 06:47 PM
they support violence and support terrorists.
Supporters of Kerry didnt support violence and didnt go join bin laden cause Bush won.
if u think suicide bombing is the right way of disagreeing, then you need to get yourself back to the third world
Me and ma sista neva said dat we supported terrorists... u said dat!!!
u have posted a picture with hamas terrorists burning flags :?
Hamas r NOT terrorists!!!! Israel r da terrorists!! Their damn leader SHARON got terrorist written all over his ugly face!!!
And why r u talkin about Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden all da time huh?
i guess as i watched Bus 65 being blown to peices with two good friends inside is not terrorism.
Oh im so sorry about your friends... naaaah.. just kiddin.
like i said before, with your last line, your not even muslim, you pretend to be.
may alla so mercy to u
So now your callin me a kafir???
Im a muslim ALHAMDULILLAH !!!!!!
how can u be muslim when u joke at the death of innocents,
when i support US action, i dont laugh at iraqi deaths
your twisting your faith to fit your needs, it should be the other way around, oh well, after what happened in Holland, Europe will soon close its doors to the muslim world
Cunard
December 9th, 2004, 06:48 PM
So the difference is that U.S. or Israel does not claim that it targets civilians, even though some of their troops do (moreso Israel than U.S.)--and don't say that don't without reading the news first.
My point is that your logic is flawed. You argue that the civilian deaths in Iraq are justified since the attacks were "directed" at insurgents or Saddam, regardless of how many civilian bystandards died in the attacks or how weak the evidence was that insurgents or Saddam were among civilian populations. Using your logic one can argue that an attack on a civilian population in Israel or America is justified even if you have reason to believe that one soldier may be among a group of crowded civilians.
the option of doing nothing such as letting sanctions stand as they were was killing more. to go into iraq and get rid of saddam was the less of two evils.
in war people die, sad but true.
Neither of those evils was necessary.
sure they were, Iraq invaded Kuwait and Saudi Arabia and used chemical weapons on his own people, killed Shias and Kurds, payed palestinians militants.
yea the shiah love America so much that they dragged four Americans through the streets and waged an uprising... People arent naturally hateful...events that occur in their lives like a family member being killed by American bombs which lead to them takin up arms.
the draging of the 4 americans happend in Falluja....a sunni town,
bigbobs
December 9th, 2004, 06:48 PM
i guess as i watched Bus 65 being blown to peices with two good friends inside is not terrorism.
If you only shared an ounce of that sympathy towards civilians killed on the other side.
i did before, my opinions hardened the other way after i saw what muslims were saying
Okaaay, that makes soooo much sense! (sarcasm)
So how about all Muslims support terrorist attacks on American civilians due to what a few Americans have said?
Anyway I'm out from here...since you guys don't seem open minded at all it's just a waste of my time. You already have your opinions made and will defend them regardless of how ridiculous your arguments are.
Peace,
Bobs
Cunard
December 9th, 2004, 06:50 PM
So the difference is that U.S. or Israel does not claim that it targets civilians, even though some of their troops do (moreso Israel than U.S.)--and don't say that don't without reading the news first.
My point is that your logic is flawed. You argue that the civilian deaths in Iraq are justified since the attacks were "directed" at insurgents or Saddam, regardless of how many civilian bystandards died in the attacks or how weak the evidence was that insurgents or Saddam were among civilian populations. Using your logic one can argue that an attack on a civilian population in Israel or America is justified even if you have reason to believe that one soldier may be among a group of crowded civilians.
the option of doing nothing such as letting sanctions stand as they were was killing more. to go into iraq and get rid of saddam was the less of two evils.
in war people die, sad but true.
Neither of those evils was necessary.
sure they were, Iraq invaded Kuwait and Saudi Arabia and used chemical weapons on his own people, killed Shias and Kurds, payed palestinians militants.
We all agree that Saddam was a ruthless leader, but he could have been removed under means that would not cause as much destruction to Iraqi civilians. You need to weigh whether the benefit of having him removed is greater than the loss of life to the Iraqi people. You can't answer that, neither can I, nor CNN, FOX, etc. but the Iraqi people themselves. The fact that most Iraqis are supporting the insurgents suggest they disagree with how he was removed from power.
my personal opinion is that he should have been removed in the first Gulf War, no sanctions would have happened, but there was no political will at the time, and for tthat we payed a heavy price now on both sides, but to let this problem drag on for another ten years would have killed even more
Cunard
December 9th, 2004, 06:51 PM
i guess as i watched Bus 65 being blown to peices with two good friends inside is not terrorism.
If you only shared an ounce of that sympathy towards civilians killed on the other side.
i did before, my opinions hardened the other way after i saw what muslims were saying
Okaaay, that makes soooo much sense! (sarcasm)
So how about all Muslims support terrorist attacks on American civilians due to what a few Americans have said?
Anyway I'm out from here...since you guys don't seem open minded at all it's just a waste of my time. You already have your opinions made and will defend them regardless of how ridiculous your arguments are.
Peace,
Bobs
you are forgetting the millions thats marched against the Iraq war
mr$ lloyd bank$
December 9th, 2004, 06:52 PM
i guess as i watched Bus 65 being blown to peices with two good friends inside is not terrorism.
Oh im so sorry about your friends... naaaah.. just kiddin.[/quote]
like i said before, with your last line, your not even muslim, you pretend to be.
may alla so mercy to u[/quote]
So now your callin me a kafir???
Im a muslim ALHAMDULILLAH !!!!!![/quote]
how can u be muslim when u joke at the death of innocents,
when i support US action, i dont laugh at iraqi deaths
your twisting your faith to fit your needs, it should be the other way around, oh well, after what happened in Holland, Europe will soon close its doors to the muslim world[/quote]
U make me SICK! im just bein honest.. I dont care about your friends! Does dat make me a bad person? Naaah I dont think so!!!
U dont know how im in real life, and how i live ma life just 2 praise Allah(SWT), so dont say dat crap about me!!!!!!!
WildWolfdog
December 9th, 2004, 07:26 PM
What the isrealis gov't and the US gov't is doing is wrong but i do think the girl is being hypocritical in her views. Voicing her opinion is alright, but if you are going to represent something, don't just get stuck on one thing. Wearing a hijab and dislikin foreign policies is alright, but you are not only cussin, using vulgar language as well as have boyfriends. That's just going to make it worse to argue on your behalf.
Gettin pissed and pissing other people off won't make your point seem any more legit than theirs.
zimmy24
December 9th, 2004, 09:28 PM
man they gotta be the fukkin hottest hijabis i've ever seen
i'd hit it no man that'd be haram :no:
adren@line
December 9th, 2004, 11:09 PM
I personally think it is more offensive to attack a nation than a religion.
Religion is intangible. A nation is very tangible, atleast in comparison to religion, and the condition of a nation has much more of an immediate effect on the individual.
And yes, it is idiots like this who need to be deported, since she is clearly anti-European.
adren@line
December 9th, 2004, 11:12 PM
actually nevermind.
It is within her democratic rights to be anti-European/American, atleast in her viewpoints.
But the minute she starts acting on these beliefs and starts to scheme against her country (some European countru)/US, she should be deported, at the least.
Khal
December 9th, 2004, 11:23 PM
So the difference is that U.S. or Israel does not claim that it targets civilians, even though some of their troops do (moreso Israel than U.S.)--and don't say that don't without reading the news first.
My point is that your logic is flawed. You argue that the civilian deaths in Iraq are justified since the attacks were "directed" at insurgents or Saddam, regardless of how many civilian bystandards died in the attacks or how weak the evidence was that insurgents or Saddam were among civilian populations. Using your logic one can argue that an attack on a civilian population in Israel or America is justified even if you have reason to believe that one soldier may be among a group of crowded civilians.
the option of doing nothing such as letting sanctions stand as they were was killing more. to go into iraq and get rid of saddam was the less of two evils.
in war people die, sad but true.
Neither of those evils was necessary.
sure they were, Iraq invaded Kuwait and Saudi Arabia and used chemical weapons on his own people, killed Shias and Kurds, payed palestinians militants.
America was the one who put Sadaam in power. And they are the ones who also provided Sadaam with the Chemical and biological weapons.
http://cnparm.home.texas.net/911/Backg/Rumsfeld-Saddam.jpg
Khal
December 9th, 2004, 11:35 PM
they support violence and support terrorists.
Supporters of Kerry didnt support violence and didnt go join bin laden cause Bush won.
if u think suicide bombing is the right way of disagreeing, then you need to get yourself back to the third world
Me and ma sista neva said dat we supported terrorists... u said dat!!!
u have posted a picture with hamas terrorists burning flags :?
Hamas r NOT terrorists!!!! Israel r da terrorists!! Their damn leader SHARON got terrorist written all over his ugly face!!!
And why r u talkin about Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden all da time huh?
i guess as i watched Bus 65 being blown to peices with two good friends inside is not terrorism.
U.S. Rights Group Discusses Jenin
May 2, 2002
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
JERUSALEM (AP) -- A U.S.-based human rights group said Israeli troops may have committed war crimes during the house-to-house battle at the Jenin refugee camp, but there was no evidence supporting Palestinian claims of a massacre.
Danny Ayalon, an adviser to Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, said, ``I flatly reject the war crimes charge. It was a war zone. It was full of booby traps and explosives,'' adding the Israeli army ``did everything to be reasonable.''
In its report to be published Friday, Human Rights Watch said three of its investigators spent a week gathering testimony in the Jenin camp and documented the deaths of 52 Palestinians, 22 of whom were civilians.
Ayalon also disputed the group's figures. ``Of the 51 bodies found, 44 were of armed terrorists and seven of civilians, which we very much regret,'' he said.
A summary of the 48-page Human Rights Watch report said many civilians ``were killed willfully or unlawfully. The abuses we documented in Jenin are extremely serious and in some cases appear to be war crimes.''
An army spokesman said the military was studying the summary. Israel has said that Palestinian militants themselves broke the rules of war by setting up bases and stockpiling arms and explosives in a civilian residential area.
The Jenin Hospital said Wednesday that 52 bodies had been recovered so far.
The eight days of fierce fighting in the camp ended April 11 and left 23 Israeli soldiers dead and dozens more wounded.
Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat on Thursday called Jenin ``the new Stalingrad,'' referring to the Russian city now known as Volgograd where about 1 million Soviet soldiers and civilians died during a 200-day offensive by the German army, in the bloodiest battle of World War ll.
Other Palestinian officials have alleged that hundreds of Palestinians were killed during the Israeli invasion of the Jenin camp. Palestinian Cabinet Minister Saeb Erekat told CNN that 500 Palestinians had been killed in the fighting, although he later told The Associated Press he could not document the figure.
Human Rights Watch said its experts had found nothing to back such allegations.
``Human Rights Watch did not find evidence to support claims that the (Israeli military) massacred hundreds of Palestinians in the camp,'' the report said.
Fakhri Turkman, a Palestinian Legislative Council member and the head of an emergency committee set up to help camp residents, criticized Human Rights Watch and other groups who did not use the term ``massacre'' to describe the Israeli operation.
``Sometimes we call it a massacre when you kill one innocent person,'' he told The Associated Press on Thursday.
Citing specific cases detailed by Palestinians, Human Rights Watch said troops killed a wounded Palestinian gunman hours after he had been disarmed. The group also alleged that fire from an Israeli armored vehicle killed a 14-year-old boy on his way to buy groceries after the army lifted its curfew in the camp.
It said a 57-year-old man, Kamal Zghair, was shot and then run over by tanks as he was moving along a main road in a wheelchair, displaying a white flag. The report said a paralyzed man was crushed in the rubble of his home after soldiers refused to give his family sufficient time to carry him away before the army bulldozed the house.
Source: Human Rights watch
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/international/AP-Mideast-Jenin-Camp.html
Khal
December 9th, 2004, 11:37 PM
I personally think it is more offensive to attack a nation than a religion.
Religion is intangible. A nation is very tangible, atleast in comparison to religion, and the condition of a nation has much more of an immediate effect on the individual.
And yes, it is idiots like this who need to be deported, since she is clearly anti-European.
I never knew Israel and America were part of Europe. :scratch:
Khal
December 9th, 2004, 11:38 PM
actually nevermind.
It is within her democratic rights to be anti-European/American, atleast in her viewpoints.
But the minute she starts acting on these beliefs and starts to scheme against her country (some European countru)/US, she should be deported, at the least.
And it is ur so called democratic view to be anti Islamic.
adren@line
December 10th, 2004, 12:48 AM
I personally think it is more offensive to attack a nation than a religion.
Religion is intangible. A nation is very tangible, atleast in comparison to religion, and the condition of a nation has much more of an immediate effect on the individual.
And yes, it is idiots like this who need to be deported, since she is clearly anti-European.
I never knew Israel and America were part of Europe. :scratch:
that was in reference to the girl who this topic is about. In her profile, it says that she resides in Europe.
Khal
December 10th, 2004, 02:18 PM
She lives in Denmark, and Denmark is an ally of the U.S. They didn't even accept the Euro dollar. At one point the Danish government thought about banning Halaal meat for the Muslims. But the Jews found this offensive and put an end to this false propaganda.
Cunard
December 11th, 2004, 06:26 AM
She lives in Denmark, and Denmark is an ally of the U.S. They didn't even accept the Euro dollar. At one point the Danish government thought about banning Halaal meat for the Muslims. But the Jews found this offensive and put an end to this false propaganda.
wanting the US to fail and cheering the militants on is also being anti danish since Danish troops are in Iraq and have died in Iraq. Instead of cheering on the enemy she should protest against danish involvment in Iraq and ask troops be called home. By supporting the militants, she is being anti danish and thus should be deported from her adoptive country
TheJungl1st
March 16th, 2005, 05:56 PM
I hate to bump this thread, but whatever.
Mr$ Lloyd Banks, I doubt that you are really Muslim, because if you were, you wouldn't be supporting terrorists like OBL or rejoicing at the deaths of innocent people.
If you really have the balls to say all of that on here, then surely you have the balls to say this in public.
You are a disgrace to the Islamic faith, and it's people like you that make lives miserable for other Muslims who don't want to have anything to do with the filth you espouse.
Remember this verse:
If anyone slew a person - unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land - it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people. Then although there came to them Our apostles with clear signs, yet, even after that, many of them continued to commit excesses in the land." - Quran 5:32
Get out of here you filthy scum.
vBulletin® v3.8.2, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.