RollsRoyce
March 27th, 2004, 11:56 PM
You are all lucky to be receiving this reference that I have typed with my own hands from a book that I possess called: The Gulf Crisis and the New World Order
The second kind of wars fought in the Middle East, can be classified as part of the armed struggle for the expansionism of Zionism. During the hostilities of 1948-1949, the entire blame was put on the Palestinians and their neighbouring Muslim countries for their 'attacks' on Israel. It has been argued that the Jews had to come in retaliation and, in this process, ended up annexing more territory in their area. But in 1967, Israel's war of aggression was entirely for the purpose of expansion. There was no element of self-defence involved. It was waged in such a dreadful and destructive manner that the countries of Egypt, Syria, and Jordan were decimated within a few days, and it resulted in further expansion of Israeli territory. Therefore Israel succeeded in occupying territory that is many times larger than the territory originally allocated to her under the 1948 Mandate.
Now I will give you a brief account of the continued Zionist expansionism so that you may have some idea of the extent to which the Israelis have enlarged their territory, are still doing so, and would continue to do so in the future.
It was probably in 1937 that for the first time the British government announced, in the context of the Balfour declaration of 1917, how much territory would be allocated for the Jewish state. An area of 5000 sq. km. was earmarked for the Jewish state, but towards the end of 1947, when the matter was reviewed by the UN the area increased to 20,000 sq. km. Some additional territory was annexed by Israel during hostilities with Palestinians and Arabs, in the following 2 years, as stated earlier. In this process an area of 88,000 sq. km. came under the control of the Israelis by the end of 1967. Thus one can well imagine that starting from a nominal figure of 5000 sq. km., how rapidly Israeli territory was expanded to 88,000 sq. km.
In October of 1973 the "War of Yom Kippur" (passover day, a holy day for Jews) was fought. On that day in 1973, Israel came under attack by the join forces of Egypt, Syria, and Jordan. It is alleged that this war of aggression was inititiated by Arabs and that the Jews are blameless, but this is not entirely correct. The reason is that after the war of 1967, the UN security council unanimously passed Resolution No. 642 censuring Israel and ordering it to withdraw its forces from the occupied territory which had fallen in its hand during the hostilities. But at the same time mischievous lacuna was left in the resolution (as is normal with the British and Western diplomacies) so that when the time for implementation of this resolution arrives, new debates can be started on the supplementery issues to confuse the matter. So this provision in the resolution mentioned that it would regard the right of all states in the region safeguarded so that their geographical boundaries are not endangered or threatened. The motive behind the resolution was that when time approached for implementation of the resolution, the the provision could be stretched to make the resolution ineffective, in the interest of Jews, by saying that the security of Israel demands that such and such territorial changes and adjustetments be made prior to its implementation. Consequently none of the provisions of the resolution have so far been complied and the matter remains suspended since the 1967 war. The hostilities of 1973 took place because the Arabs had, eventually, decided to try to recover their own land. To call this action aggression is quite unjust. This was the effort of a weak and oppressed nation. As the great powers were not helpful to have a UN resolution implemented, they thought of making an attempt of their own.
To summarize the case, it is quite apparrent now that these powerful Western nations have given Israel the right to resort to the use of force whenever and wherever it desires. It has the right to refuse to vacate the territory forcibly acquired, even if the Security Council of the UN decides that is should withdraw from its occupied lands. On the contrary the aggrieved countries whose territories have been occupied by Israel have no right even to make their own efforts to get a UN resolution implemented. But Israel enjoys total immunity and freedom to do whatever it chooses.
One thing I could not mention earlier was that during the period of 1947-1949, Israel laid the foundation of modern day terrorist activities, under the command of Menachem Begin. A British Deputy Governor of Palestine was among those killed as a result of these terrorist activities. The king David Hotel in Jerusalem was blown up, resulting in the death of 100 people, besides causing a huge loss in property. Palestinians were openly attacked, resulting the slaughter of 3000 Muslim men, women, and children in a short period of time. They even clashed with the British, for the reason that in those days the Labour Governement in Britain, and Mr. Bevin who was its foreign secretery, were convinced that the Muslims were oppressed and the Jews were committing the atrocities. Mr. Bevin even made some efforts to stop illegal immigration of the Jews into Palestine. To quote one instance, the British forces intercepted a ship carrying 4000 Jews intending to enter Palestine illegally. Mr. Bevin ordered them back to Germany. The Western journalists villified him, even though he had been entrusted by the trustees of that region with the responibility of not allowing anymore Jews illegally into Palestine. Regarding this James Cameron even writes in his book "The Making of Israel" how unjust it was to send them back to the cruel and unfortunate land of Germany- although this was 1949, 2 years after the war. At a time when British and American forces had established their occupation in Germany and were guarantors for Jewish protection. These events lend support to my contention that modern day terrorism was invented and initiated by the Jews for the purpose of helping Zionist immigrants to safety. The historical background shows that the western powers accept the right of the Jews to carry out terrorism and that these activities were not to be termed "Jewish terrorism". On the other hand, the Muslim countries are not even allowed to retaliate to protect their territorial and political interests, and if they do so then not only are they censured but even Islam is slandered and such efforts are maliciously termed "Islamic Terrorism". The other rights and privileges which appear to have been accorded to the Jews are that:
1. The Jews have the right to defy the Security Council resolutions and they even have the right to regard these resolutions with contempt, reject them or toss them into the proverbial trash can. Yet no country has the right to condemn this behaviour.
2. Israel has the right to alter the geographical boundaries of its neighbouring countries on the pretext of its security considerations.
3. Israel has the right to produce and stockpile atomic bombs and other nuclear devices. It can even manufacture chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction.
No one seems to have the right, particularly Muslim countries, even to criticize Israel for indulging in such activities.
(excerpts taken from "THE GULF CRISIS AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER" by Hazrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad (RU). This book was published in 1992, and it seems that the predictions made in this book are coming true in front of our own eyes)
The second kind of wars fought in the Middle East, can be classified as part of the armed struggle for the expansionism of Zionism. During the hostilities of 1948-1949, the entire blame was put on the Palestinians and their neighbouring Muslim countries for their 'attacks' on Israel. It has been argued that the Jews had to come in retaliation and, in this process, ended up annexing more territory in their area. But in 1967, Israel's war of aggression was entirely for the purpose of expansion. There was no element of self-defence involved. It was waged in such a dreadful and destructive manner that the countries of Egypt, Syria, and Jordan were decimated within a few days, and it resulted in further expansion of Israeli territory. Therefore Israel succeeded in occupying territory that is many times larger than the territory originally allocated to her under the 1948 Mandate.
Now I will give you a brief account of the continued Zionist expansionism so that you may have some idea of the extent to which the Israelis have enlarged their territory, are still doing so, and would continue to do so in the future.
It was probably in 1937 that for the first time the British government announced, in the context of the Balfour declaration of 1917, how much territory would be allocated for the Jewish state. An area of 5000 sq. km. was earmarked for the Jewish state, but towards the end of 1947, when the matter was reviewed by the UN the area increased to 20,000 sq. km. Some additional territory was annexed by Israel during hostilities with Palestinians and Arabs, in the following 2 years, as stated earlier. In this process an area of 88,000 sq. km. came under the control of the Israelis by the end of 1967. Thus one can well imagine that starting from a nominal figure of 5000 sq. km., how rapidly Israeli territory was expanded to 88,000 sq. km.
In October of 1973 the "War of Yom Kippur" (passover day, a holy day for Jews) was fought. On that day in 1973, Israel came under attack by the join forces of Egypt, Syria, and Jordan. It is alleged that this war of aggression was inititiated by Arabs and that the Jews are blameless, but this is not entirely correct. The reason is that after the war of 1967, the UN security council unanimously passed Resolution No. 642 censuring Israel and ordering it to withdraw its forces from the occupied territory which had fallen in its hand during the hostilities. But at the same time mischievous lacuna was left in the resolution (as is normal with the British and Western diplomacies) so that when the time for implementation of this resolution arrives, new debates can be started on the supplementery issues to confuse the matter. So this provision in the resolution mentioned that it would regard the right of all states in the region safeguarded so that their geographical boundaries are not endangered or threatened. The motive behind the resolution was that when time approached for implementation of the resolution, the the provision could be stretched to make the resolution ineffective, in the interest of Jews, by saying that the security of Israel demands that such and such territorial changes and adjustetments be made prior to its implementation. Consequently none of the provisions of the resolution have so far been complied and the matter remains suspended since the 1967 war. The hostilities of 1973 took place because the Arabs had, eventually, decided to try to recover their own land. To call this action aggression is quite unjust. This was the effort of a weak and oppressed nation. As the great powers were not helpful to have a UN resolution implemented, they thought of making an attempt of their own.
To summarize the case, it is quite apparrent now that these powerful Western nations have given Israel the right to resort to the use of force whenever and wherever it desires. It has the right to refuse to vacate the territory forcibly acquired, even if the Security Council of the UN decides that is should withdraw from its occupied lands. On the contrary the aggrieved countries whose territories have been occupied by Israel have no right even to make their own efforts to get a UN resolution implemented. But Israel enjoys total immunity and freedom to do whatever it chooses.
One thing I could not mention earlier was that during the period of 1947-1949, Israel laid the foundation of modern day terrorist activities, under the command of Menachem Begin. A British Deputy Governor of Palestine was among those killed as a result of these terrorist activities. The king David Hotel in Jerusalem was blown up, resulting in the death of 100 people, besides causing a huge loss in property. Palestinians were openly attacked, resulting the slaughter of 3000 Muslim men, women, and children in a short period of time. They even clashed with the British, for the reason that in those days the Labour Governement in Britain, and Mr. Bevin who was its foreign secretery, were convinced that the Muslims were oppressed and the Jews were committing the atrocities. Mr. Bevin even made some efforts to stop illegal immigration of the Jews into Palestine. To quote one instance, the British forces intercepted a ship carrying 4000 Jews intending to enter Palestine illegally. Mr. Bevin ordered them back to Germany. The Western journalists villified him, even though he had been entrusted by the trustees of that region with the responibility of not allowing anymore Jews illegally into Palestine. Regarding this James Cameron even writes in his book "The Making of Israel" how unjust it was to send them back to the cruel and unfortunate land of Germany- although this was 1949, 2 years after the war. At a time when British and American forces had established their occupation in Germany and were guarantors for Jewish protection. These events lend support to my contention that modern day terrorism was invented and initiated by the Jews for the purpose of helping Zionist immigrants to safety. The historical background shows that the western powers accept the right of the Jews to carry out terrorism and that these activities were not to be termed "Jewish terrorism". On the other hand, the Muslim countries are not even allowed to retaliate to protect their territorial and political interests, and if they do so then not only are they censured but even Islam is slandered and such efforts are maliciously termed "Islamic Terrorism". The other rights and privileges which appear to have been accorded to the Jews are that:
1. The Jews have the right to defy the Security Council resolutions and they even have the right to regard these resolutions with contempt, reject them or toss them into the proverbial trash can. Yet no country has the right to condemn this behaviour.
2. Israel has the right to alter the geographical boundaries of its neighbouring countries on the pretext of its security considerations.
3. Israel has the right to produce and stockpile atomic bombs and other nuclear devices. It can even manufacture chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction.
No one seems to have the right, particularly Muslim countries, even to criticize Israel for indulging in such activities.
(excerpts taken from "THE GULF CRISIS AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER" by Hazrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad (RU). This book was published in 1992, and it seems that the predictions made in this book are coming true in front of our own eyes)