View Full Version : Amreekans come in here for a second plz
SharpenedMango
October 31st, 2006, 02:43 PM
just for one moment realise that u are not the chosen fucking people, u dont have the biggest economy on earth, just the most weapons, practically every single country on this planet has the EU as its biggest and greatest trading partner, and let me tell u something else, unlike the USA, most people in this world like the EU
so suck it
ps
EU GDP: 13.6 Trillion US Dollars
Amreeka: 12.75 Trillion USD
oh and the EUs size is 200 million more because unlike the supposed united states, we actually invite new countries to join, how long u gonna keep puerto rico waiting HUH?
/end rant
pps spiky's rant is also currently available in General Chat
*LATE EDITION*- someone has also pointed out to me that amreekans are crap at sex
Lakk Chiree
October 31st, 2006, 02:46 PM
Move to Canada.
Spiky
October 31st, 2006, 02:47 PM
EU and rest of Europe + Canada + Australia = US bitches
/ end thread
Shh! Dont tell
October 31st, 2006, 02:47 PM
:hand:
People over the ocean have better chances of getting laid here.
Pakichic01
October 31st, 2006, 02:47 PM
You know we're the shiiiiiT when everyones talkn bout us so :slap:
i kidding :bhapi:
khanbaba_
October 31st, 2006, 02:47 PM
Move to Canada.
How did you beat spiky to this.? ;)
fratty
October 31st, 2006, 02:48 PM
just for one moment realise that u are not the chosen fucking people, u dont have the biggest economy on earth, just the most weapons, practically every single country on this planet has the EU as its biggest and greatest trading partner, and let me tell u something else, unlike the USA, most people in this world like the EU
so suck it
ps
EU GDP: 13.6 Trillion US Dollars
Amreeka: 12.75 Trillion USD
oh and the EUs size is 200 million more because unlike the supposed united states, we actually invite new countries to join, how long u gonna keep puerto rico waiting HUH?
/end rant
pps spiky's rant is also currently available in General Chat
Puerto Rico does not want to become a state.
SharpenedMango
October 31st, 2006, 02:49 PM
EU and rest of Europe + Canada + Australia = US bitches
/ end thread
earth to amreeka: no one gives a fuck about u guys, just stop bombing the crap out of the rest of the world (plz)
SharpenedMango
October 31st, 2006, 02:50 PM
Puerto Rico does not want to become a state.
sssh grown ups talking, have a cookie
SharpenedMango
October 31st, 2006, 02:51 PM
:hand:
People over the ocean have better chances of getting laid here.
yeah, coz americans are crap at sex
jspot
October 31st, 2006, 02:51 PM
just for one moment realise that u are not the chosen fucking people, u dont have the biggest economy on earth, just the most weapons, practically every single country on this planet has the EU as its biggest and greatest trading partner, and let me tell u something else, unlike the USA, most people in this world like the EU
so suck it
ps
EU GDP: 13.6 Trillion US Dollars
Amreeka: 12.75 Trillion USD
oh and the EUs size is 200 million more because unlike the supposed united states, we actually i.85 nvite new countries to join, how long u gonna keep puerto rico waiting HUH?
/end rant
pps spiky's rant is also currently available in General Chat
bad math.
460 million people in the EU = 13.6 Trillion US Dollars
300 million people in the US = 12.75 Trillion US Dollars.
so with 160 million more people (half the population of the US) you are boasting about .85 trillion more dollars?
MUHAHAHAHAHAHHA! someone needs to go back to remedial math class.
Pakichic01
October 31st, 2006, 02:51 PM
earth to amreeka: no one gives a fuck about u guys, just stop bombing the crap out of the rest of the world (plz)
every1 wants ot come to Amreeka for better liviing yah
Spiky
October 31st, 2006, 02:52 PM
earth to amreeka: no one gives a fuck about u guys, just stop bombing the crap out of the rest of the world (plz)
Unfortunately, its only the "pakis and middle easterners" in the west who think that No one in the west gives a fuck abt US. Which takes it back to my thread....:kekeke:
minimalistick
October 31st, 2006, 02:52 PM
Hmm comparing the GDP of one country vs that of 25(?) seperate countries, makes alot of sense.. yup.
zuiwaziri
October 31st, 2006, 02:54 PM
I'll give the Amreekans one thing. They have the best self marketers on the Planet, Oh and not to mention best Brainwashing skills too.
All y'all Amreekan Desi's are Brainwashed :rofl:
fratty
October 31st, 2006, 02:55 PM
The EU has a demographic time bomb on its hands. How will Europe be able to hold up its welfare system when the fertility rates are down and there are more and more people living longer. The greying of Europe will not make it economically viable. America still has a reasonable population growth rate. European countries tend to be much more xenophobic and have had the biggest problems with intergrating immigrants into the European fold i.e the Ramadan riots in France. European governments spend a fraction of their budget toward their own defense compared to America. England is the only worthwhile military power in Europe. The others are faded glory. Why do European countries limit free speech and other liberties more than America? I don't see how Europe is all that great with the exception of England, which is more idealogically akin to America than with the rest of Europe. England still maintains an identity and rebukes a lot of secularism unlike France and Sweden.
SharpenedMango
October 31st, 2006, 02:55 PM
bad math.
460 million people in the EU = 13.6 Trillion US Dollars
300 million people in the US = 12.75 Trillion US Dollars.
so with 160 million more people (half the population of the US) you are boasting about .85 trillion more dollars?
MUHAHAHAHAHAHHA! someone needs to go back to remedial math class.
god ur stupid, but let me correct u my unenlightened friend- when u invite a poor country to join the EU such as Poland, it will appear that the GDP per capita will be lower, in 30 years time it will be a developed economy too thanks to EU Aid, this is called giving a HELPING HAND, for example i bet in ur ignorance u didnt know that 30 years ago Spain and Portugal were as poor as Mexico is today, bu thanks to the EU they have grown exponentially,
nice try but i did not once mention GDP per capita but absolute GDP, that is actual dollars- remedial math? why dont u go sit maths grade 1? (i scoff in ur general direction)
Spiky
October 31st, 2006, 02:56 PM
I'll give the Amreekans one thing. They have the best self marketers on the Planet, Oh and not to mention best Brainwashing skills too.
All y'all Amreekan Desi's are Brainwashed :rofl:
We have too many blondes up here, how can anyone beat that :p
SharpenedMango
October 31st, 2006, 02:56 PM
Hmm comparing the GDP of one country vs that of 25(?) seperate countries, makes alot of sense.. yup.
amreeka is 50 states no? so thats 25 vs 50? vot, u want me to halve amreeka's pathetic gdp in 2?
SharpenedMango
October 31st, 2006, 02:57 PM
every1 wants ot come to Amreeka for better liviing yah
im sure ur right, taxi drivers do earn more in america
fratty
October 31st, 2006, 02:58 PM
France, Italy, Great Britain and Germany have lower GDP per capita than all but four of the states in the United States. HAHAHA
jspot
October 31st, 2006, 02:58 PM
god ur stupid, but let me correct u my unenlightened friend- when u invite a poor country to join the EU such as Poland, it will appear that the GDP per capita will be lower, in 30 years time it will be a developed economy too thanks to EU Aid, this is called giving a HELPING HAND, for example i bet in ur ignorance u didnt know that 30 years ago Spain and Portugal were as poor as Mexico is today, bu thanks to the EU they have grown exponentially,
nice try but i did not once mention GDP per capita but absolute GDP, that is actual dollars- remedial math? why dont u go sit maths grade 1? (i scoff in ur general direction)
you are still not making sense. Ha, you are comparing the 30yr future EU to current day US. my sides are splitting from laughing to hard.
man if you can predict the future, can you tell me tomorrow's lotto ticket numbers. please. oh wait, tell me the numbers 30 years from now! ouch my sides.
zuiwaziri
October 31st, 2006, 02:59 PM
Hmm comparing the GDP of one country vs that of 25(?) seperate countries, makes alot of sense.. yup.
The EU has the same Principals as the USA (united STATES of Amreeka), as in its 25 separate STATES with their own governments joining together to govern bigger issues together.
The US does the same, except there are 50 seperate STATES all with governments, Governers, States Laws etc, but as total they work together for USA law.
So really 25 states are kicking the Ass of 50 :hand:
SharpenedMango
October 31st, 2006, 02:59 PM
comparing a country to a coalition of TWENTY-FIVE countries.
yup, makes sense.
of course it does when one realises that both operate as independent trading blocs. The EU is defacto one nation when it comes to the economy, completely free movement of labour and of capital, no tariffs, a shared body of law- a shared higher court, the Acquis of the EU accounts for the majority of its countries laws.
madam_jade
October 31st, 2006, 03:00 PM
comparing a country to a coalition of TWENTY-FIVE countries.
yup, makes sense.
You silly reposter.
SharpenedMango
October 31st, 2006, 03:01 PM
you are still not making sense. Ha, you are comparing the 30yr future EU to current day US. my sides are splitting from laughing to hard.
man if you can predict the future, can you tell me tomorrow's lotto ticket numbers. please. oh wait, tell me the numbers 30 years from now! ouch my sides.
no wonder amreekans are so stupid, u cant even parse sentences correctly, go do remedial english whilst u'r at it. I referred to Poland, not to the EU.
jspot
October 31st, 2006, 03:01 PM
The EU has the same Principals as the USA (united STATES of Amreeka), as in its 25 separate STATES with their own governments joining together to govern bigger issues together.
The US does the same, except there are 50 seperate STATES all with governments, Governers, States Laws etc, but as total they work together for USA law.
So really 25 states are kicking the Ass of 50 :hand:
shouldn't you then compare all the states and provinces with in each country to the US's 50 states. or better yet each EU locality to each US locality!
my god what happened to your education?
zuiwaziri
October 31st, 2006, 03:01 PM
We have too many blondes up here, how can anyone beat that :p
Dont even start with Blondes. Ever heard of a lil place called Sweden :hand: :p
SharpenedMango
October 31st, 2006, 03:03 PM
France, Italy, Great Britain and Germany have lower GDP per capita than all but four of the states in the United States. HAHAHA
LOL, u look at google do u? thats technically impossible, those countries have quite differing gdp per capita, and once again my amigo u miss the point. this is about absolute gdp, the actual money those countries put together make, the fact that they trade more with the outside world than the US does, they are quite simply the key driver of the world economy, the US only deceives itself into thinking it is, not the EU.
jspot
October 31st, 2006, 03:03 PM
no wonder amreekans are so stupid, u cant even parse sentences correctly, go do remedial english whilst u'r at it. I referred to Poland, not to the EU.
first its the EU then its super Poland that will beat the US.
I can't read your post anymore, I have tears in my eyes. This is better than watching Jackass2.
zuiwaziri
October 31st, 2006, 03:04 PM
shouldn't you then compare all the states and provinces with in each country to the US's 50 states. or better yet each EU locality to each US locality!
my god what happened to your education?
Clearly ur Amreekan education doesnt allow you to make sense of wht i just wrote. Its honestly a simple equation to figure out. If u cant then, well i cant help u :dunno:
SharpenedMango
October 31st, 2006, 03:05 PM
:ugh: 25 SEPARATE COUNTRIES =/= one defacto nation.
the EU is a monetary union, not a nation-state.
umm, a monetary union???
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=define%3A+acquis&meta=
The term acquis (or sometimes acquis communautaire), deriving from French, is used in European Union law to refer to the total body of EU law accumulated so far. The term is also used to describe laws adopted under the Schengen treaty, prior to its integration into the European Union legal order by the Treaty of Amsterdam, in which case one speaks of the Schengen acquis.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acquis
this Acquis forms the primary body of all of its nations, eg in the UK the acquis forms 55 percent of ALL valid UK law...ie it is more than just a monetary bloc
SharpenedMango
October 31st, 2006, 03:06 PM
Clearly ur Amreekan education doesnt allow you to make sense of wht i just wrote. Its honestly a simple equation to figure out. If u cant then, well i cant help u :dunno:
amreekan's have an education system now?
:sarb:
when did THAT happen?
zuiwaziri
October 31st, 2006, 03:06 PM
:ugh: 25 SEPARATE COUNTRIES =/= one defacto nation.
the EU is a monetary union, not a nation-state.
One step at a time my friend.
Before too long we shall be chanting U-S-E..... U-S-E
Unless tht is, if the USA doesnt pollute us all to death :no:
minimalistick
October 31st, 2006, 03:07 PM
The EU has the same Principals as the USA (united STATES of Amreeka), as in its 25 separate STATES with their own governments joining together to govern bigger issues together.
The US does the same, except there are 50 seperate STATES all with governments, Governers, States Laws etc, but as total they work together for USA law.
So really 25 states are kicking the Ass of 50 :hand:
And the populations of our states are much smaller then that of the European Unions "states" aka countries. The GDP of California alone is higher then that of 7 of the worlds countries. So ONE of our states is kicking the ass of maybe 293 countries in the world? (Assuming around 300 countries)
SharpenedMango
October 31st, 2006, 03:07 PM
what does this have to do with the UK forum exactly?
zuiwaziri
October 31st, 2006, 03:08 PM
amreekan's have an education system now?
:sarb:
when did THAT happen?
They do too ya kno..... They dont call it education though. Its called Seasame Street :rofl:
bash_mg
October 31st, 2006, 03:09 PM
amreekas is FUCKED :)
fratty
October 31st, 2006, 03:09 PM
http://www.timbro.com/euvsusa/pdf/EU_vs_USA_English.pdf
Read this report:Preface
IF THE EU WERE A PART of the United States of America, would it belong to the richest
or the poorest group of states?
At the beginning of the 1990s, there was no need to ask. Europe’s economic future was
a subject of growing optimism. Productivity growth had for some decades been higher
than in other countries of similar standing, and that growth was now going to be hugely
accelerated by the elimination of trade barriers and the closer economic integration resulting
from the Single Market. The EU as an institution was – and was undoubtedly seen as
– a vehicle for growth and economic liberalisation. In other words, the EU was able to do
what politicians in several member countries had wished for but had failed to achieve: to
increase economic openness, to strengthen the process of competition, and harness the
political process behind a liberal reform agenda.
Today, the perspectives on the EU, and the outlook on its future, are radically different.
Economic growth during the 1990s never became what many had wished for. Some
countries performed reasonably well, most notably Ireland, but on the whole the EU
was lagging far behind other countries during the whole decade. Productivity growth
decreased and by mid-decade the EU was running behind the US in this respect. The
process of convergence in productivity, a much talked-about process since the 1970s,
had once again become a process of divergence.
The role, and status, of the EU in the economic reform process has also changed. Instead
of a clear focus on economic reforms and growth, the EU (the Commission as well as the
Council) has concentrated its ambitions on other political objectives. Hence, the EU no
longer is – or is seen as – the great economic liberator of Europe. It is generally not
performing as a vehicle for reforms, nor as leverage for policies that are needed but
impossible to accomplish in the national political arenas.
Is it possible to break the spell of economic stagnation in Europe? Yes, undoubtedly.
But, alas, it seems highly improbable. The member countries have agreed on a relatively
far-reaching reform agenda in the Lisbon accord (yes, in the modern European context it
is far-reaching). But the agenda lacks impetus. Not to say a true awareness of the need
of reforms. Worse still, many European politicians and opinion-formers seem totally
unaware of the lagging performance of the EU economies and that a few percentage
units lower growth will affect their welfare in comparison with other economies.
Such is the background to this study on the differences in growth and welfare between
Europe and the US. Too many politicians, policy-makers, and voters are continuing their
long vacation from reality. On the one hand, they accept, or in some cases even prefer, a
substantially lower growth than in the US. On the other hand, they still want us to enjoy
the same luxuries and be able to afford the same welfare as Americans can. Needless to
say, that is not possible. But the real political problem is that lower welfare standards –
as with inequality in general – are a relative measure for most people. They are always
viewed by comparison with others, and rarely in absolute terms. People would rather
weep in the backseat of a new Mercedes than in the backseat of a second-hand
Volkswagen.
This study is based on a widely acclaimed and thought-provoking book – Sweden versus
the US – that was published earlier this year in Swedish by the same authors – Dr. Fredrik
Bergström, President of The Swedish Research Institute of Trade, and Mr. Robert
Gidehag, formerly the Chief Economist of the same institute, and now President of the
Swedish Taxpayers’ Association. The study presents important perspectives on European
growth and welfare. Its highlight is the benchmark of EU member states and regions to
US states. The disturbing result of that benchmark should put it at the top of the agenda
for Europe’s future.
Fredrik Erixon
Chief Economist, Timbro
SharpenedMango
October 31st, 2006, 03:09 PM
They do too ya kno..... They dont call it education though. Its called Seasame Street :rofl:
:roflbow:
i can't stop laughing, its almost as funny as watching amreekans trying to google in EU and find out what it is
SharpenedMango
October 31st, 2006, 03:12 PM
amreekas is FUCKED :)
Amreeka was fucked
Amreeka is fucked
Amreeka will be fucked
ok my rant is over, back to work, nice chatting to u all
bb
zuiwaziri
October 31st, 2006, 03:13 PM
And the populations of our states are much smaller then that of the European Unions "states" aka countries. The GDP of California alone is higher then that of 7 of the worlds countries. So ONE of our states is kicking the ass of maybe 293 countries in the world? (Assuming around 300 countries)
If the GDP of California is higher than 7 countries then it is kicking 7 countries Ass's not 293 :slap:
I can prolly name those countries for u.....
San Marino, Leichstenstien, Monseraat, Andora, Faroe Islands, The Island of Tikki Tikki & possibley the Vatican City.
I bet my personal GDP is higher than any of these countries
zuiwaziri
October 31st, 2006, 03:16 PM
Amreeka was fucked
Amreeka is fucked
Amreeka will be fucked
ok my rant is over, back to work, nice chatting to u all
bb
The Eagle may have defeated the Bear, but im just waiting for the Dragon to Destroy the eagle
Muuuuuuuuuuuuuhahahahahhahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!
fratty
October 31st, 2006, 03:16 PM
LOL, u look at google do u? thats technically impossible, those countries have quite differing gdp per capita, and once again my amigo u miss the point. this is about absolute gdp, the actual money those countries put together make, the fact that they trade more with the outside world than the US does, they are quite simply the key driver of the world economy, the US only deceives itself into thinking it is, not the EU.
Well answer my previous post over the failing welfare state of many European countries and the falling fertility rates and greying of its population. How will Europe stay economically competitive. Our higher education system is superior to Europe's. The top universities in the world most of them are in the US and well of course England has a good few. But the rest of Europe is failing in education and research. England should just join in a new organization where England, the US, Canada, Australia, India, New Zealand, Japan, and other emerging powers are at the helm.
fratty
October 31st, 2006, 03:18 PM
If the GDP of California is higher than 7 countries then it is kicking 7 countries Ass's not 293 :slap:
I can prolly name those countries for u.....
San Marino, Leichstenstien, Monseraat, Andora, Faroe Islands, The Island of Tikki Tikki & possibley the Vatican City.
I bet my personal GDP is higher than any of these countries
California's GDP is seventh in the world is what he probably meant.
fratty
October 31st, 2006, 03:23 PM
A higher percentage of US residents own computers, phones, microwaves, and washer/dryers than all European countries.
zuiwaziri
October 31st, 2006, 03:56 PM
A higher percentage of US residents own computers, phones, microwaves, and washer/dryers than all European countries.
Thats cuz Europeans arent fat n Lazy.
Computers - we choose to hand write, thus still having the ability to write w/o the use of spell checker.
Microwaves - We still have the ability to cook. No1 goes out for an "Amreekan" yet we all love to go out for Italian, French, Greek food etc.
We also kno the art of manual labour, now apart from Amreekan Hilbillies, y'all dont kno an honest days work :hand:
di vinci
October 31st, 2006, 04:07 PM
The EU has a demographic time bomb on its hands. How will Europe be able to hold up its welfare system when the fertility rates are down and there are more and more people living longer. The greying of Europe will not make it economically viable. America still has a reasonable population growth rate. European countries tend to be much more xenophobic and have had the biggest problems with intergrating immigrants into the European fold i.e the Ramadan riots in France. European governments spend a fraction of their budget toward their own defense compared to America. England is the only worthwhile military power in Europe. The others are faded glory. Why do European countries limit free speech and other liberties more than America? I don't see how Europe is all that great with the exception of England, which is more idealogically akin to America than with the rest of Europe. England still maintains an identity and rebukes a lot of secularism unlike France and Sweden.
COME ON YAAR WHY DO U THINK THEY INVITED THE PAKIS OVER THEY BREED LIKE RABBITS LOL. AND TYEHY WILL KEEP THE Eu RUNNING FOIR A MILLENIUM
jspot
October 31st, 2006, 04:47 PM
Thats cuz Europeans arent fat n Lazy.
Computers - we choose to hand write, thus still having the ability to write w/o the use of spell checker.
Microwaves - We still have the ability to cook. No1 goes out for an "Amreekan" yet we all love to go out for Italian, French, Greek food etc.
We also kno the art of manual labour, now apart from Amreekan Hilbillies, y'all dont kno an honest days work :hand:
Dude, you're an idiot. I am not basing this from what you just wrote, I basing it from your entire collection of post on ratedesi.
you are like an ant throwing rocks at a mountain. insignificant.
and do you really think the rest of Europe considers you pakis European?
Your just their diswashers and cabdrivers.
jspot
October 31st, 2006, 05:00 PM
lets end this with the numbers
IMF list Rank Country GDP 2006 estimate
— World 46,746,844
— European Union 14,206,987
1 United States 13,228,391
2 Japan 4,420,955
3 Germany 2,890,092
4 People's Republic of China 2,554,200
5 United Kingdom 2,362,580
6 France 2,227,330
7 Italy 1,841,042
8 Canada 1,273,144
9 Spain 1,216,736
10 Russia 975,338
11 Brazil 966,827
12 South Korea 892,008
13 India 849,905
14 Mexico 846,782
15 Australia 729,165
16 Netherlands 624,885
17 Turkey 414,079
18 Belgium 373,273
19 Switzerland 360,586
20 Sweden 359,463
21 Republic of China (Taiwan) 350,176
22 Saudi Arabia 346,330
23 Poland 320,763
24 Indonesia 315,434
25 Austria 306,235
26 Norway 305,045
27 Denmark 263,351
28 South Africa 254,795
29 Iran 240,420
30 Greece 228,012
31 Argentina 210,147
32 Republic of Ireland 207,472
33 Finland 193,344
34 Hong Kong, PRC 187,414
35 Thailand 185,576
36 Portugal 181,366
37 Venezuela 156,482
38 United Arab Emirates 152,446
39 Malaysia 144,033
40 Colombia 136,840
41 Pakistan 133,903
42 Singapore 129,339
43 Czech Republic 128,556
44 Israel 123,479
45 Chile 118,188
46 Algeria 117,473
47 Nigeria 116,177
48 Romania 113,693
49 Philippines 111,520
50 Hungary 110,481
51 Egypt 109,484
52 New Zealand 106,888
53 Ukraine 94,691
54 Peru 85,050
55 Kuwait 85,050
56 Bangladesh 65,018
57 Kazakhstan 66,252
58 Vietnam 54,509
59 Morocco 54,075
60 Slovakia 51,253
61 Qatar 44,909
62 Libya 44,759
63 Angola 40,483
64 Croatia 39,197
65 Belarus 36,685
66 Sudan 36,030
67 Ecuador 35,543
68 Luxembourg 34,939
69 Slovenia 34,982
70 Oman 34,402
71 Tunisia 32,324
72 Guatemala 29,072
73 Lithuania 28,361
74 Bulgaria 28,259
75 Dominican Republic 28,240
76 Syrian Arab Republic 27,644
77 Serbia and Montenegro 26,883
78 Sri Lanka 25,867
79 Lebanon 23,281
80 Kenya 21,292
81 Costa Rica 20,453
82 Azerbaijan 20,235
83 Turkmenistan 19,849
84 Latvia 19,406
85 Trinidad and Tobago 18,951
86 El Salvador 18,191
87 Yemen 17,433
88 Uruguay 17,398
89 Cameroon 17,390
90 Cyprus 17,039
91 Iceland 16,810
92 Côte d'Ivoire 16,534
93 Panama 16,273
94 Bahrain 14,788
95 Jordan 14,440
96 Estonia 13,900
97 Uzbekistan 13,253
98 Tanzania 12,993
99 Ethiopia 12,788
100 Ghana 11,302
101 Jamaica 10,767
102 Bolivia 10,298
103 Bosnia and Herzegovina 10,117
104 Botswana 9,573
105 Gabon 9,512
106 Uganda 9,419
107 Honduras 9,072
108 Albania 8,759
109 Senegal 8,510
110 Afghanistan 8,608
111 Democratic Republic of the Congo 8,451
112 Zambia 8,422
113 Paraguay 7,971
114 Nepal 7,910
115 Equatorial Guinea 7,520
116 Mozambique 7,007
117 Georgia 7,517
118 Namibia 6,469
119 Brunei Darussalam 6,434
120 The Bahamas 6,314
121 Mauritius 6,293
122 Chad 6,006
123 Republic of the Congo 5,886
124 Burkina Faso 5,844
125 Cambodia 5,935
126 Malta 5,509
127 Nicaragua 5,358
128 Mali 5,340
129 Republic of Macedonia 5,299
130 Madagascar 5,100
131 Myanmar 4,720
132 Haiti 4,897
133 Benin 4,490
134 Papua New Guinea 4,048
135 Armenia 4,188
136 Niger 3,472
137 Netherlands Antilles 3,356
138 Barbados 3,479
139 Moldova 3,309
140 Guinea 3,226
141 Mauritania 3,194
142 Fiji 3,029
143 Laos 3,006
144 Swaziland 2,589
145 Kyrgyzstan 2,646
146 Tajikistan 2,626
147 Zimbabwe 2,485
148 Rwanda 2,336
149 Togo 2,184
150 Malawi 2,154
151 Mongolia 2,134
152 Suriname 1,545
153 Central African Republic 1,422
154 Sierra Leone 1,336
155 Lesotho 1,314
156 Belize 1,131
157 Eritrea 1,076
158 Cape Verde 1,033
159 Bhutan 967
160 Burundi 965
161 Maldives 934
162 Antigua and Barbuda 932
163 St. Lucia 906
164 Guyana 829
165 Djibouti 748
166 Seychelles 677
167 Grenada 519
168 The Gambia 486
169 St. Kitts and Nevis 486
170 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 442
171 Comoros 402
172 Timor-Leste 378
173 Samoa 360
174 Solomon Islands 313
175 Guinea-Bissau 291
177 Dominica 295
178 Tonga 230
179 São Tomé and Príncipe 71
180 Kiribati 64
Rank Country 2005 GDP
millions of US dollars
— World 44,454,843
— Europe 15,736,725
— European Union European Union 13,502,800
1 Flag of Germany Germany 2,791,737
2 Flag of United Kingdom United Kingdom 2,229,472
3 Flag of France France 2,126,719
4 Flag of Italy Italy 1,765,537
5 Flag of Spain Spain 1,126,565
6 Flag of Russia Russia 763,287
7 Flag of Netherlands Netherlands 629,911
8 Flag of Switzerland Switzerland 382,438
9 Flag of Belgium Belgium[1] 371,695
10 Flag of Sweden Sweden 367,571
11 Flag of Turkey Turkey 362,461
12 Flag of Austria Austria 305,338
13 Flag of Poland Poland[1] 303,229
14 Flag of Norway Norway 295,672
15 Flag of Denmark Denmark 259,643
16 Flag of Greece Greece 225,591
17 Flag of Republic of Ireland Ireland 200,770
18 Flag of Finland Finland[1] 196,053
19 Flag of Portugal Portugal 183,619
20 Flag of Czech Republic Czech Republic 124,310
21 Flag of Hungary Hungary[1] 109,195
22 Flag of Romania Romania 98,566
23 Flag of Ukraine Ukraine 82,876
24 Flag of Kazakhstan Kazakhstan 56,088
25 Flag of Slovakia Slovakia 47,459
26 Flag of Croatia Croatia 38,510
27 Flag of Luxembourg Luxembourg 36,531
28 Flag of Slovenia Slovenia 34,030
29 Flag of Belarus Belarus 29,566
30 Flag of Bulgaria Bulgaria 26,719
31 Flag of Lithuania Lithuania 25,504
32 Serbia Serbia[1] 24,058
33 Flag of Cyprus Cyprus 16,695
34 Flag of Latvia Latvia[1] 15,826
35 Flag of Iceland Iceland 15,823
36 Flag of Estonia Estonia 13,108
37 Flag of Azerbaijan Azerbaijan 12,561
38 Flag of Bosnia and Herzegovina Bosnia and Herzegovina 9,343
39 Flag of Albania Albania[1] 8,379
40 Flag of Georgia (country) Georgia 6,395
41 Republic of Macedonia Republic of Macedonia 5,722
42 Flag of Malta Malta 5,454
43 Flag of Armenia Armenia 3,782
44 Flag of Moldova Moldova 2,917
Flag of Andorra Andorra ..
Flag of Liechtenstein Liechtenstein ..
Montenegro Montenegro ..
Flag of Monaco Monaco ..
Flag of San Marino San Marino ..
Flag of Vatican City Vatican City ..
2005
Rank State 2005 GSP
($millions) 2004
Rank 2004 GSP
($millions)
1 California 1,621,843 1 1,519,202
2 Texas 982,403 3 903,208
3 New York 963,466 2 906,783
4 Florida 674,049 4 609,372
5 Illinois 560,236 5 533,735
6 Pennsylvania 487,169 6 463,752
7 Ohio 442,440 7 425,173
8 New Jersey 430,787 8 410,306
9 Michigan 377,895 9 366,601
10 Georgia 364,310 10 339,730
11 Virginia 352,745 12 327,032
12 North Carolina 344,641 11 323,962
13 Massachusetts 328,535 13 312,700
14 Washington 268,502 14 253,085
15 Maryland 244,899 15 230,698
16 Indiana 238,638 16 229,449
17 Minnesota 233,292 17 224,620
18 Tennessee 226,502 18 216,769
19 Wisconsin 217,537 19 207,739
20 Missouri 216,069 20 205,847
21 Colorado 216,064 21 201,392
22 Arizona 215,759 22 194,246
23 Connecticut 194,469 23 182,468
24 Louisiana 166,310 24 160,186
25 Alabama 149,796 25 141,366
26 Oregon 145,351 28 134,615
27 Kentucky 140,359 26 133,003
28 South Carolina 139,771 27 131,492
29 Oklahoma 120,549 30 111,838
30 Iowa 114,291 29 110,210
31 Nevada 110,546 31 99,143
32 Kansas 105,448 32 98,927
33 Utah 89,836 34 82,546
34 Arkansas 86,802 33 82,712
District of Columbia 82,777 77,510
35 Mississippi 80,197 35 77,107
36 Nebraska 70,263 36 67,989
37 New Mexico 69,324 37 63,645
38 New Hampshire 55,690 39 52,084
39 Delaware 54,354 38 52,298
40 West Virginia 53,782 41 49,903
41 Hawaii 53,710 40 50,238
42 Idaho 47,178 42 43,509
43 Maine 45,070 43 43,258
44 Rhode Island 43,791 44 41,844
45 Alaska 39,872 45 35,988
46 South Dakota 31,066 46 29,699
47 Montana 29,851 47 27,583
48 Wyoming 27,422 48 24,092
49 North Dakota 24,178 49 22,692
50 Vermont 23,134 50 21,992
jspot
October 31st, 2006, 05:09 PM
bad math.
460 million people in the EU = 13.6 Trillion US Dollars
300 million people in the US = 12.75 Trillion US Dollars.
so with 160 million more people (half the population of the US) you are boasting about .85 trillion more dollars?
MUHAHAHAHAHAHHA! someone needs to go back to remedial math class.
now back to my orginal argument.
300 million people in the US = 12.75 Trillion US Dollars. > 460 million people in the EU = 13.6 Trillion US Dollars
so the population of of the EU is 53% larger than the US, however, the absolute GDP of the EU is only 7% larger.
do you not see the discrepency here?
paulie walnuts
November 1st, 2006, 01:26 AM
my raging-inferiority-complex detector just went off.
The Anti Desi
November 1st, 2006, 02:16 AM
Whats so great about the EU?? So what their economy is bigger now?? Now you just decide to conglomerate and now think bigger? So now you decide to expand?? Countries in the Middle East hate y'all as well.....as do the Mexican, South Americans, and Africans.
I bet Euro Desis are crappier at sex.
The Anti Desi
November 1st, 2006, 02:21 AM
Seriously....your research sucks.
Jspot owned you.
vBulletin® v3.8.2, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.