PDA

View Full Version : The fourth Test between England and Pakistan has been forfeited in favour of England


sufyan182
August 20th, 2006, 07:36 PM
A stupid Umpiring dicision
Discuss......

desi_uk_jatt
August 20th, 2006, 07:40 PM
darell hair is a legend... :salut:

HeppyG
August 21st, 2006, 04:18 AM
The paks should not tamper with the ball and it was only 6 runs they were forefiting so why??//

desi_uk_jatt
August 21st, 2006, 04:24 AM
The paks should not tamper with the ball and it was only 6 runs they were forefiting so why??//:slap: they felt insulted thats why

tyfrm_nj
August 21st, 2006, 04:31 AM
The paks should not tamper with the ball and it was only 6 runs they were forefiting so why??//


First of all Pakis did not Temper the ball.. there is NO evidence either... pakis have been accused in the past too and specially Dannel Hair does not favor pakis.... Plus its a matter of being insulted so Pakistanis did a very good decision... :o

crystalgems2
August 21st, 2006, 05:07 AM
...

Pakis....troublemakers......problematic everywhere

CremeDeLaCreme
August 21st, 2006, 05:39 AM
In the 90's when Wasim, Imran and Waqar were acheiving great movement with the ball they were accused of cheating and ball-tampering

Last year in the Ashes series Simon Jones managed to obtain some movement too but, this was called 'reverse swing'

The ICC is blatantly racist towards Asian Sub-Continent teams and umpire Hair should not officiate over anymore games involving countries from this region

Mind you it was a conflict of interest having Hair there in the first place. Doesn't he reside in England?

desi_uk_jatt
August 21st, 2006, 06:29 AM
In the 90's when Wasim, Imran and Waqar were acheiving great movement with the ball they were accused of cheating and ball-tampering

Last year in the Ashes series Simon Jones managed to obtain some movement too but, this was called 'reverse swing'

The ICC is blatantly racist towards Asian Sub-Continent teams and umpire Hair should not officiate over anymore games involving countries from this region

Mind you it was a conflict of interest having Hair there in the first place. Doesn't he reside in England?never heard of it, hmmm well i heard indian sub-continent....

Kambuja
August 21st, 2006, 06:45 AM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/5269906.stm

Hair mesiter will not be officiating any Pakistan cricket matches in the future!

boredatwork
August 21st, 2006, 06:48 AM
Good decision by Pakistan to protest. Hair, did follow the letter of the law. If he found evidence that the ball was tampered then that's his decision as an umpire. The alleged tampering happened in the 15mins after the Gul yorker wicket (after which he checked the ball) and the random check. The 26 Sky cameras focused on the ball have found no evidence.

By forfeiting the game they have put the ball in the ICCs court to find how/when/whom tampered the ball. If they cant then Pakistan were justified. Had Pakistan continued to play they would admitted responsibility to a crime they didn't do, which would have been idiotic.

saffy
August 21st, 2006, 07:35 AM
Supporting pakistans decision all the way.....
This racist should be banned from international cricket.....all through the series he was giving crap LBW decisions,even the flipping english commentators were saying hes making to many wrong decisions.
26+ Cameras and not one piece of evidence suggesting ball tampering.....Pakistan was gonna win teh test easy,racist umpire makes england win.
OH BTW...it was a 5 run penalty AND....ENGLAND CHOSE THE NEXT NEW BALL!. meaning pakistan would never be able to get anyone out with a shit ball. This darryl hair guy has always got a problem with pakistan,srilanka + india.

sufyan182
August 21st, 2006, 08:00 AM
Pakis....troublemakers......problematic everywhere
Law 42.3 which states: “the event of any fielder changing the condition of the ball unfairly ... the umpires shall award five penalty runs to the batting side.”
...
to oll da dumbass biast ppl ....who feel and portray that according to rule game has been forfeited ....
how about dis rule guys...?
vich says ANY FIELDER.....which fielder....umpire cud'nt point out......
here is an elite panel umpire who does'nt even no da rules ov da game...
he gav Inzi's runout in faisalabad test last winter ....wher according to rules when a player is taking an evasive actions he cant b givin out and it happens in january when AB diviliers (S.A) was out of his crease but wus takin evasive actions to avoid the ball. Umpire Aleem Dar gav him NOT OUT in Australia...
see a new umpire new da rules but a so called veteran does'nt

kashif1986
August 21st, 2006, 08:09 AM
darell hair is a legend... :salut:
ur an idiot

sufyan182
August 21st, 2006, 08:12 AM
Originally Posted by desi_uk_jatt
darell hair is a legend...
ur an idiot

absolutely agreed .....
and here is his competence
http://content-uk.cricinfo.com/ci/content/current/story/257308.html
sick bast**d

sufyan182
August 21st, 2006, 08:26 AM
here is da proof...wot u said in other thread...
Sachin Innocent tendulkar......ha ha ha
Sachin Tendulkar South Africa v India, Port Elizabeth, 2001
Mike Denness, the match referee for the India-South Africa series, found Tendulkar guilty of "acting on the match ball" while bowling on the third day of the second Test at Port Elizabeth. Tendulkar was banned for one Test match and also fined 75% of his match fee

http://content-uk.cricinfo.com/ci/content/story/108107.html
http://content-uk.cricinfo.com/ci/content/current/story/257338.html

paki_Faz
August 21st, 2006, 08:40 AM
darell hair has had a history against pak, india and sri lanka

and wht mike atherton said was true

"wen england reverse swing its exccellent but if pakistan do it theirs sumfin wrong" lol all da commentators wer on pakis side ramiz raja was pissed

Adz4eva
August 21st, 2006, 08:46 AM
Darrell Hair is a fat useless waste of space.

Remember people, reverse swing use to be called ball tampering :cool:

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=5336291854292673616&q=pakistan+cricket

djar
August 21st, 2006, 09:00 AM
This is outrageous! Clearly Hair has issues with Asian teams and specially with Pakistan. Though, I agree with Ian Botham in blaming ICC for not appointing other umpires, given there is so much history with Hair & Pakistan. People have conflicts all over but it's the managements responsibility to plan & avoid them from happening. Having Hair in this series was like waiting for a volcano to erupt. I'd rather booo ICC. Hair is just a human with lack of common sense. And not to mention, pre-conceived approach of the English boo' in spectators."

zaph69
August 21st, 2006, 02:23 PM
First of all Pakis did not Temper the ball.. there is NO evidence either... pakis have been accused in the past too and specially Dannel Hair does not favor pakis.... Plus its a matter of being insulted so Pakistanis did a very good decision... :o

but how do you know they DIDN'T tamper with the ball? come on, this is one of the most filthy nations in term of cricketing etiquette.

shahid afridi scuffing the wicket during the bomb scare, anyone?

boredatwork
August 21st, 2006, 02:35 PM
but how do you know they DIDN'T tamper with the ball? come on, this is one of the most filthy nations in term of cricketing etiquette.

shahid afridi scuffing the wicket during the bomb scare, anyone?

26 cameras! :hand: