PDA

View Full Version : Gandhi wanted Hindus dead!!


stymvjyt
July 11th, 2006, 05:22 PM
here (http://www.sulekha.com/blogs/blogdisplay.aspx?cid=64503)

superblade
July 11th, 2006, 06:52 PM
This Ghandi that you speak of seems like a pretty violent fellow........





.

hvarma
July 11th, 2006, 07:05 PM
You have to understand that Gandhi preached passive resistant, Satyagraha. He wanted a solution to be reached without having to physically fight. He preached primarily to Hindus and Sikhs because some Muslims in India wanted to identify their unity in a new country, now Pakistan. He told all religions who were involved in fighting to make peace and cease the bloodshed, but he specifically tried to tell Hindus and Sikhs as well as any other followers to find a solution without the violence. Of course at that time, a woman wouldn't mind killing someone to save her child and she could as well think, why not end the life of my child and myself rather than live a life in shame, why struggle? Same with men, would anyone want to advise their people fight fight fight? People cant just sit hand on hand and wait till they get killed. Why would they flee from their country of birth. Their solution was to not fight, even if that costed them their lives. They had a goal in mind to make a movement without violence. India and Pakistan both lost many of their own family, but rather than tit for tat, some chose to practice Satyagraha.

Indian1986
July 12th, 2006, 04:42 AM
Gandhi allowed bhagat singh and his comrades to die.

Southside chick
July 12th, 2006, 04:53 AM
where the fuck do yall get this shit from? u know that aent true. u must be another one of them islam-haters who make up shit in any and every way to tarket islam.

reggie_xox
July 12th, 2006, 09:35 AM
Uhh.. who gives a flying fuck what Ghandi said?
Yu cant change it. Why bother?
Hes dead now anyways.
Its not like yu cant chase him down and make him take back what he said.
:blahblah:

RacingSoul
July 12th, 2006, 10:10 AM
I make bold to say that if Hindus and Sikhs sacrifice their lives at the hands of Muslims without rancor or retaliation they will become the saviors not only of their own religions but also of Islam and the whole world. [/COLOR] [/SIZE]
Saving Hinduism by Killing all the Hindus (http://www.sulekha.com/blogs/blogdisplay.aspx?cid=64503)

that quote right there clearly contradicts ur thread title...he didnt want'em dead, he wanted them to sacrifice themselves for the good of both hindus/sikhs & muslims...after all he too wanted bloodshed to end after partition.

RacingSoul
July 12th, 2006, 10:13 AM
Gandhi allowed bhagat singh and his comrades to die.

bhagat singh & his ppl acted plain dumb....one killing after another was sure to put'em in jail sooner or later...i think if gandhi & bhagat singh worked together, they wuda achieved freedom long ago.

Indian1986
July 12th, 2006, 11:49 AM
whatever man to me he was the real freedom figher along with mangal pandey,bose,ashfaqullah khan and sukhdev.

hvarma
July 12th, 2006, 05:15 PM
pathetic choice made then. tit for tat is superior to just doing nothing and being slaughtered. what an idiotic philosophy

Since when was it up to you to decide which is superior, evidently its what the people followed, and that fact cant be changed.

hvarma
July 12th, 2006, 05:21 PM
Gandhi allowed bhagat singh and his comrades to die.

He didnt want them to die, they each had their own reason to fight, its called Pride...and you saying Gandhi allowed Bhagat Singh to die is like me saying you let your friends who smoke hurt their bodies by not taking any actions like telling them to not smoke, and if you say that is their preference then we can say it was any martyr's self made choice to fight and even die for their country, you dont make a point man.

hunggar
July 12th, 2006, 06:13 PM
?????

where do people find this crap? Actually that wasnt the case at all.

I'll tell u that it goes down alot deeper than that.

Gandi worked for the british. Most people don't know that but he was allowed to be there because of the british and they put him there for specific reasons so that the british could manipulate the system in india for the rest of their lives.

nadiafreez
July 13th, 2006, 12:36 AM
I can't believe this guy is so revered, he wanted hindus to let Muslims kill them during partition. Unbelievable

The Hindus of the Punjab are seething with anger. The Sikhs say that they are the followers of Guru Gobind Singh who has taught them how to wield the sword. But I would exhort the Hindus and Sikhs again and again not to retaliate. I make bold to say that if Hindus and Sikhs sacrifice their lives at the hands of Muslims without rancor or retaliation they will become the saviors not only of their own religions but also of Islam and the whole world.

Saving Hinduism by Killing all the Hindus (http://www.sulekha.com/blogs/blogdisplay.aspx?cid=64503)


wat gandhi really meant was for hindud and sikhs to surrender to the muslims

haha sike