PDA

View Full Version : Pakistan to discuss Kashmir with Saudi king


xsilent_watersx
January 12th, 2006, 02:43 PM
Pakistan plans to discuss its peace initiatives on Jammu and Kashmir with Saudi Arabian King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz when he visits Islamabad after a historic trip (http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/7598_1597055,000500020000.htm#) to New Delhi.

Pakistani officials said they would take up the Kashmir issue with the king, and hope that Indian officials "will give importance to King Abdullah's views on Kashmir".

The Saudi king embarks on a five-nation tour (http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/7598_1597055,000500020000.htm#) from January 21. He will be the chief guest at India's Republic Day function January 26. It is the first time a Saudi monarch will visit India in five decades.

Pakistan is attaching great importance to the king's visit to South Asia.

"He is visiting the country on the invitation of President Pervez Musharraf," an official told the agency.

Muhsrraf had invited the king when he visited Saudi Arabia last month to attend the extraordinary Organisation of Islamic Conference summit.

Musharraf held a one-on-one meeting with the king in Makkah on the sidelines of the OIC summit. Musharraf briefed Abdullah on the peace parleys between India and Pakistan.

Apart from India and Pakistan, Abdullah will also visit China, Hong Kong and Malaysia.

"During his stay in Pakistan, King Abdullah will have extensive discussions on bilateral, regional and international issues," said the official. He said the Kashmir issue would also figure.

Foreign office spokesperson Tasneem Aslam said the dates of the Saudi king's visit had not yet been firmed but it was expected to start February 1.

"Relations with Saudi Arabia are one of the fundamentals of Pakistan's foreign policy (http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/7598_1597055,000500020000.htm#). It's a very unique and very special relationship."

Asked if the king was taking any proposal by Pakistan on Kashmir to India, she said: "Saudi Arabia has always stood by Pakistan."

Pakistan was not included in King Abdullah's itinerary until Musharraf's met him last month. "Musharraf not only invited the king but also advocated Saudi Arabia's role in bringing permanent peace to the (South Asian) region," an official said.

He said the king would "definitely take up the peace issue in India and Pakistan".

The official said since India wanted to improve relations with Saudi Arabia, "it will give importance to King Abdullah's views on Kashmir".

Pakistan and Saudi Arabia are expected to sign at least three agreements for expansion of bilateral cooperation. The president will host a banquet in honour of the king.





Discuss...

notoriou$punjabi
January 12th, 2006, 03:08 PM
Musharaf wants what quebecers failed to do....by loosing the refer

but india on the other hand will use Israeli tactics of cleaning Azad kashmir or terrorists just as in palestine

secretagent
January 12th, 2006, 06:15 PM
peace talks :sarb: pakistan army has illegally occupied 1/3 of kashmir it has no right being there in-fact it has nothing to do with pakistan let alone any one else like King Abdullah its is between Kashmir and India, kashmir is part of India and will remain so there will be no peace as long as pakistan remains in kashmir end of story.....

MrHarmfulOne
January 12th, 2006, 06:31 PM
What the hell does the King of Saudi Arabia have to do with Kashmir?

Tell him to go back to his harems, ferraris and oil wells and worry about all the fanatic nut in his own country.

Bajrang Bali
January 12th, 2006, 07:47 PM
well being the saudi king invest so much into kashmir, he desparetly wishes for some say in it, if his will falls deaf india wouldve killed 2 birds with 1 stone

bad_cheque
January 12th, 2006, 10:16 PM
Musharraf will get tips on democracy.

Himalayan King
January 12th, 2006, 11:08 PM
what the heck does this saudi dude have to do with south asian affairs??? why should we give importance to someone from a country of cavemen with a lot of UNDESERVED money??????

bad_cheque
January 12th, 2006, 11:17 PM
what the heck does this saudi dude have to do with south asian affairs??? why should we give importance to someone from a country of cavemen with a lot of UNDESERVED money??????
We could say that about a lot of countries.

Felonius Monk
January 13th, 2006, 01:58 AM
why should we give importance to someone from a country of cavemen with a lot of UNDESERVED money??????

Whats the point of insulting his country. And its a crappy insult too. His country has resources. Why don't they deserve to profit off them?

The fact that you're posting on the internet and own a computer means you're somewhere in the upper brackets of the human population in terms of wealth. Did you 'deserve' to be born into a decent life? I think not.

Himalayan King
January 13th, 2006, 03:00 AM
Whats the point of insulting his country. And its a crappy insult too. His country has resources. Why don't they deserve to profit off them?

The fact that you're posting on the internet and own a computer means you're somewhere in the upper brackets of the human population in terms of wealth. Did you 'deserve' to be born into a decent life? I think not.
Spare me the pain of typing by not posting... lol jk :p

It wasn't really an insult...all i meant was that these dudes havent DONE anything that has benefitted the world. They were only sitting on a loy of oil that has given them this ephemeral importance.....just you wait and see...another 20 years.......and its medieval age deja vu for the saudis

princeofkolkata
January 13th, 2006, 03:17 AM
is saudi king gonna buy kashmir??? :sarb:

Himalayan King
January 13th, 2006, 03:21 AM
is saudi king gonna buy kashmir??? :sarb:
:roflbow:

Indian_Eyess
January 13th, 2006, 03:54 AM
is saudi king gonna buy kashmir??? :sarb:
That would be kinda cool. The thorn would be removed.

MrHarmfulOne
January 13th, 2006, 05:31 AM
Arabs owning kashmir?!

*sigh*

lol

nvthis
January 13th, 2006, 07:00 AM
Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah has offered to pay to repair India's largest mosque, Delhi's historic Jama Masjid (Grand Mosque).

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4581056.stm

Does anyone think this is kind of linked to the future visit?

Street_Scholar
January 13th, 2006, 12:58 PM
Indian army has brutally occupied Kashmir, for years. I think India should do the honorable thing and stop oppressing the minorities. Kashmir belongs to Pakistanis. There are countless incidents of Indian army abducting and killing men and women in Kashmir. There is a major aids problem in India, India should be spending less on the military and more on the development of the nation, such as providing treatment for aids and providing basic standers of living for the millions living in slums.

xsilent_watersx
January 13th, 2006, 01:04 PM
Indian army has brutally occupied Kashmir, for years. I think India should do the honorable thing and stop oppressing the minorities. Kashmir belongs to Pakistanis. There are countless incidents of Indian army abducting and killing men and women in Kashmir. There is a major aids problem in India, India should be spending less on the military and more on the development of the nation, such as providing treatment for aids and providing basic standers of living for the millions living in slums.it would be better for pak to do that as well ;)

Street_Scholar
January 13th, 2006, 01:27 PM
it would be better for pak to do that as well ;)


Yeah, however a nation like Pakistan has to protect its sovereignty, when there is a state like India, that only wants to see the destruction of it, and a nation which is occupying its territory by force.

Bajrang Bali
January 13th, 2006, 02:12 PM
Indian army has brutally occupied Kashmir, for years. I think India should do the honorable thing and stop oppressing the minorities. Kashmir belongs to Pakistanis. There are countless incidents of Indian army abducting and killing men and women in Kashmir. There is a major aids problem in India, India should be spending less on the military and more on the development of the nation, such as providing treatment for aids and providing basic standers of living for the millions living in slums.

Terrorist have brutally occupied Kashmir for years, this is why 700,000 Kashmiri Hindus in the past few years are now living outside Kashmir terrorized out've their homeland.. In Indian Kashmir Hindus are as small minorities as Musalman in India, only they're culture is thriving in peace. Pakistan has a larger proportion of it's population living below the poverty line and growing worse while India is improving year by year so don't even go there.

Bajrang Bali
January 13th, 2006, 02:19 PM
Yeah, however a nation like Pakistan has to protect its sovereignty, when there is a state like India, that only wants to see the destruction of it, and a nation which is occupying its territory by force.

force my butt, Kashmir is part of a democracy, terrorist are the only real ones forcing anything. believe if they wanted to concede pakistan they would've done it as quick as Pakistan did when they partitioned the subcontinent, kashmiris are very capable of that but the only ones crying are the terrorist from the PoK side

Rishi_TEX
January 13th, 2006, 02:20 PM
Indian army has brutally occupied Kashmir, for years. I think India should do the honorable thing and stop oppressing the minorities. Kashmir belongs to Pakistanis. There are countless incidents of Indian army abducting and killing men and women in Kashmir. There is a major aids problem in India, India should be spending less on the military and more on the development of the nation, such as providing treatment for aids and providing basic standers of living for the millions living in slums.


pakistan is on a brink of major economic disaster, esp w/ the earthquake, it cant feed its own ppl and provide anything to the victims..why in GODS NAME would kashmir be given to a terrorist country? you're deillusional. its like throwing a goat in lion's den... pak being the goat obviously.

Space-Cowboy
January 13th, 2006, 03:06 PM
Indian army has brutally occupied Kashmir, for years. I think India should do the honorable thing and stop oppressing the minorities. Kashmir belongs to Pakistanis. There are countless incidents of Indian army abducting and killing men and women in Kashmir. There is a major aids problem in India, India should be spending less on the military and more on the development of the nation, such as providing treatment for aids and providing basic standers of living for the millions living in slums.


The stupidest thing I've ever heard. Go ask any Kashmiri.... they don't want a part of either country... especially NOT PAKISTAN.

Street_Scholar
January 13th, 2006, 03:58 PM
The stupidest thing I've ever heard. Go ask any Kashmiri.... they don't want a part of either country... especially NOT PAKISTAN.


Then why not let the Kashmirs vote? lets give them a vote.

Street_Scholar
January 13th, 2006, 04:02 PM
pakistan is on a brink of major economic disaster, esp w/ the earthquake, it cant feed its own ppl and provide anything to the victims..why in GODS NAME would kashmir be given to a terrorist country? you're deillusional. its like throwing a goat in lion's den... pak being the goat obviously.


loool, they said that 50 years ago. Pakistan's economy is better then its ever been. please try to state facts then pure bullshit. The only terrorists are the Indian army, state terrorism is no different then non-state terrorism. Even human rights organizations have condemn the actions of the Indian army. The Indian army is committing genocide. And we all know, how the Indian government works, its all too clear what has happened over the years its well documented. Such as operation blue star, babari masque, recently the Gujarat massacre.

Street_Scholar
January 13th, 2006, 04:06 PM
force my butt, Kashmir is part of a democracy, terrorist are the only real ones forcing anything. believe if they wanted to concede pakistan they would've done it as quick as Pakistan did when they partitioned the subcontinent, kashmiris are very capable of that but the only ones crying are the terrorist from the PoK side


Lol India a democracy? lol just because India calls its self a democracy doesn't make it one, many government organizations discriminate against peoples of a low-caste most Indians believe in the caste-system, many low-caste people are treated like shit. Its very well documented, the Dalits have been suffering for years.

Space-Cowboy
January 13th, 2006, 04:40 PM
Then why not let the Kashmirs vote? lets give them a vote.

Why not give them SOVEREIGNTY? That's what they really want... Kashmiris don't give two shits about Pakistan.

Street_Scholar
January 13th, 2006, 04:46 PM
Why not give them SOVEREIGNTY? That's what they really want... Kashmiris don't give two shits about Pakistan.


We can give them a vote, 90% of Kashmirs would want to be with Pakistan then India, isn't that what democratic societies do? voting?

The only reason why Pakistani army is in Kashmir is to protect the people from terrorists and from the Indian army.

Space-Cowboy
January 13th, 2006, 05:43 PM
We can give them a vote, 90% of Kashmirs would want to be with Pakistan then India, isn't that what democratic societies do? voting?

The only reason why Pakistani army is in Kashmir is to protect the people from terrorists and from the Indian army.


Nope..... 90% would want to be SOVEREIGN.... they DON'T WANT TO BE WITH PAKISTAN....... And while we're on this streak of pulling statistics out of our asses.... [you more so]..... I can guarantee that about 95+% don't want the Pakistan army there in the first place.

coyne20
January 13th, 2006, 05:56 PM
Indian army has brutally occupied Kashmir, for years. I think India should do the honorable thing and stop oppressing the minorities. Kashmir belongs to Pakistanis. There are countless incidents of Indian army abducting and killing men and women in Kashmir. There is a major aids problem in India, India should be spending less on the military and more on the development of the nation, such as providing treatment for aids and providing basic standers of living for the millions living in slums.

LOLZ only a pakistani muslim would say that. The thing is, u r using the divide and conquer rule here. 1st its gonna be kashmir and then some next indian state and so on. Listen up you pakistani kashmiri sullahs, Kashmir will always be a part of India no doubt about tat. So you can naff off back to pakistan if u dont like it cos we is not letting it go.

Indian_Eyess
January 13th, 2006, 05:57 PM
Nope..... 90% would want to be SOVEREIGN.... they DON'T WANT TO BE WITH PAKISTAN....... And while we're on this streak of pulling statistics out of our asses.... [you more so]..... I can guarantee that about 95+% don't want the Pakistan army there in the first place.
How about we allow Kashmiris to choose their fate, India, Pakistan, or independence? I think that would be fair enough, but then again, politics has it that the voices of the people be ignored so this 'vote' taking place itself is out of the question.

Space-Cowboy
January 13th, 2006, 05:59 PM
How about we allow Kashmiris to choose their fate, India, Pakistan, or independence? I think that would be fair enough, but then again, politics has it that the voices of the people be ignored so this 'vote' taking place itself is out of the question.


Go for it.. the voting thing.... I'm just saying I pretty much know what the outcome will be... Unanamous desire to be a sovereign nation.






















edit: In reference to you sig..... I ain't no one's slave..... ;)

The Anti Desi
January 13th, 2006, 06:00 PM
Until someone actually gives us census results on what the people want, don't say whose side the Kashmiris want to take. We are arguing something that no one has provided the report on.

Indian_Eyess
January 13th, 2006, 06:02 PM
Go for it.. the voting thing.... I'm just saying I pretty much know what the outcome will be... Unanamous desire to be a sovereign nation.





















edit: In reference to you sig..... I ain't no one's slave..... ;)
maybe you're right, but the prospect of such a vote happening is highly unlikely.

lol, well slavery doesnt necessarily imply evil or negative things, we're a slave to our desires and our wants.

Indian_Eyess
January 13th, 2006, 06:03 PM
Until someone actually gives us census results on what the people want, don't say whose side the Kashmiris want to take. We are arguing something that no one has provided the report on.
this kind of information is hard to find since most Indians and Pakistanis have a limit on such census results.

Space-Cowboy
January 13th, 2006, 06:05 PM
maybe you're right, but the prospect of such a vote happening is highly unlikely.

lol, well slavery doesnt necessarily imply evil or negative things, we're a slave to our desires and our wants.


There's always a slight possibility of a Kashmir wide referendum.... however small... [similar to the Quebec referendums]....






Happiness is inversely proportional to needs/wants/desires........ little bit o' Buddhism for you ;)

The Anti Desi
January 13th, 2006, 06:09 PM
this kind of information is hard to find since most Indians and Pakistanis have a limit on such census results.
In other words, we will never know what they want. It seems both countries are hiding it from us.

The Anti Desi
January 13th, 2006, 06:17 PM
Lol India a democracy? lol just because India calls its self a democracy doesn't make it one, many government organizations discriminate against peoples of a low-caste most Indians believe in the caste-system, many low-caste people are treated like shit. Its very well documented, the Dalits have been suffering for years.
That does not discredit it from being a democracy. Racism might be a side product of democracy....because the people made it that way.

Rishi_TEX
January 13th, 2006, 06:38 PM
We can give them a vote, 90% of Kashmirs would want to be with Pakistan then India, isn't that what democratic societies do? voting?

The only reason why Pakistani army is in Kashmir is to protect the people from terrorists and from the Indian army.


you're useless. seriously... the only reason pak's economy might be doing well is due to so many loans being written off by usa and other countries.. snap out of the dream. Most non-state sponsored terrorism arise from POK... since you're a paki muslim. you will obv distort the facts... go solve the rising divide within your own country between sunni and shia, then come look for kashmir.........

cassa nova
January 13th, 2006, 06:40 PM
less talk more action

pankaj9211
January 13th, 2006, 06:41 PM
Like it or not India is still the biggest Democracy in the world Population wise. Pakis have tried to attack us, send militants & now peace talks. Back in the 70s when they attacked India we had over 10K Paki soldiers in captivity but during that period the India government decided to stick to Geneva convention and return the militant armies soldiers. As usual USA has always decided to favor Pakistan due to the fact they had a base there during cold war where they launched reconnaissance missions into Soviet union. Which came back to bite them in the ASS during 9/11 If Indian Government had a gram of intelligence we would have told Pakistan that if you want your militants back give up occupied J&K.

cassa nova
January 13th, 2006, 06:46 PM
Kashmir should be given the chance to rule its own people and affairs without the 2 big bullies quarrelling and fighting over something that will probably never get resolved.

The only people i feel sorry for are the kashmiris they are the ones who have to pay the price.

pankaj9211
January 13th, 2006, 06:49 PM
Who makes them pay the price???

cynwonders786
January 13th, 2006, 06:58 PM
......

The Anti Desi
January 13th, 2006, 07:01 PM
....
Unless you have a post pertaining to the discussion, do not post here.

Attacks like that will not be tolerated.

Street_Scholar
January 13th, 2006, 07:56 PM
LOLZ only a pakistani muslim would say that. The thing is, u r using the divide and conquer rule here. 1st its gonna be kashmir and then some next indian state and so on. Listen up you pakistani kashmiri sullahs, Kashmir will always be a part of India no doubt about tat. So you can naff off back to pakistan if u dont like it cos we is not letting it go.

I can see you getting banned real quick son.

Street_Scholar
January 13th, 2006, 08:08 PM
Like it or not India is still the biggest Democracy in the world Population wise. Pakis have tried to attack us, send militants & now peace talks. Back in the 70s when they attacked India we had over 10K Paki soldiers in captivity but during that period the India government decided to stick to Geneva convention and return the militant armies soldiers. As usual USA has always decided to favor Pakistan due to the fact they had a base there during cold war where they launched reconnaissance missions into Soviet union. Which came back to bite them in the ASS during 9/11 If Indian Government had a gram of intelligence we would have told Pakistan that if you want your militants back give up occupied J&K.



I'll rather lose a war an be 'owned' for a day then for 1000 years. Learn the previous 1500 years own your own history.

Muhammad bin Qasim, Muhammed Ghuri, Alauddin Khilji, Babur, Ahmad Shah Abdali, Aurangzeb... Enough SAID!

pankaj9211
January 13th, 2006, 09:32 PM
owned for day? Pakistan lost what 2 or 3 wars with India? Terrorist states should be abolished.

RacingSoul
January 13th, 2006, 09:34 PM
wtf???

what's saudi arabia got to do with kashmir?

Street_Scholar
January 13th, 2006, 09:47 PM
owned for day? Pakistan lost what 2 or 3 wars with India? Terrorist states should be abolished.

That bullshit mate, according to fact all 3 wars were stalemates if you can class the Kangril conflict as a war, then you should go see the kill ratio, see how many Indians died ;) . Despite the fact the Indian army was 3 times stronger then the Pakistani army. Yeah you're 100% right terrorist states such as India should be abolished.

Even in the previous two wars the Pakistani air force owned India, hell Indian pilots where crashing in to mountains. Lol, what was funny and something I can never forget was when China said India has taken its sheep and China will declare war on India if they do not return them, lol the Indians were shitting themselves the Chinese said we want our sheep in 24/hrs, sometime later the Indians gathered all the sheep up and sprayed them lmao, because they were not the same color as the Chinese said was stolen by India. Anyway they sent some trucks full, and China sent them sheep to Pakistan, lol that was hilarious.

princeofkolkata
January 13th, 2006, 10:40 PM
Lol India a democracy? lol just because India calls its self a democracy doesn't make it one, many government organizations discriminate against peoples of a low-caste most Indians believe in the caste-system, many low-caste people are treated like shit. Its very well documented, the Dalits have been suffering for years.
well, ur sorta wrong here, these days in india ppl from low-castes esp the dalits r given bttr treaments and given bttr opportunities wen it comes to schooling and jobs
that caste discrimination shit has nearly ended, and i know there r some parts of rural villages that still work things backwards but we're talking majority here :neutral:

princeofkolkata
January 13th, 2006, 10:41 PM
We can give them a vote, 90% of Kashmirs would want to be with Pakistan then India, isn't that what democratic societies do? voting?

The only reason why Pakistani army is in Kashmir is to protect the people from terrorists and from the Indian army.
those terrorists ur talking about are backed up by pakistani army

MrHarmfulOne
January 13th, 2006, 11:52 PM
Like it or not India is still the biggest Democracy in the world Population wise. Pakis have tried to attack us, send militants & now peace talks. Back in the 70s when they attacked India we had over 10K Paki soldiers in captivity but during that period the India government decided to stick to Geneva convention and return the militant armies soldiers. As usual USA has always decided to favor Pakistan due to the fact they had a base there during cold war where they launched reconnaissance missions into Soviet union. Which came back to bite them in the ASS during 9/11 If Indian Government had a gram of intelligence we would have told Pakistan that if you want your militants back give up occupied J&K.


I love you.

(in a brotherly way)

MrHarmfulOne
January 13th, 2006, 11:53 PM
If Pakistan wanted to protect the people in Kashmir, they wouldnt have started the whole struggle in the first place LOL.

Indian_Eyess
January 14th, 2006, 04:25 AM
This thread has become so cliche

hey_jay37
January 14th, 2006, 04:38 AM
This thread has become so cliche
how so?

Indian_Eyess
January 14th, 2006, 06:48 PM
how so?
lol, Indians hate Pakistanis and vice versa, same argument thats been going out for decades, same solutions, same bickering, same fingerpointing, no progress.

The Anti Desi
January 14th, 2006, 06:53 PM
lol, Indians hate Pakistanis and vice versa, same argument thats been going out for decades, same solutions, same bickering, same fingerpointing, no progress.
I would have to agree. It seems more like nationalism is creating the arguments.

hey_jay37
January 15th, 2006, 04:42 AM
lol, Indians hate Pakistanis and vice versa, same argument thats been going out for decades, same solutions, same bickering, same fingerpointing, no progress.
ohhh, i see. haha then i agree with you :D

hey_jay37
January 15th, 2006, 04:43 AM
I would have to agree. It seems more like nationalism is creating the arguments.

you better not be thinking of banning nationalism topics now too, then we really wont have anything to talk about in serious discussion. hehe :p

pankaj9211
January 15th, 2006, 11:23 AM
I love you.

(in a brotherly way)


Brotherly love is cool... only if the pakis knw that they were our hindu brothers before
:dance3:

Street_Scholar
January 15th, 2006, 02:46 PM
Brotherly love is cool... only if the pakis knw that they were our hindu brothers before
:dance3:


If Indians only know all humans are brothers and sisters in humanity. :D

MrHarmfulOne
January 15th, 2006, 03:32 PM
If Indians only know all humans are brothers and sisters in humanity. :D

Then obviously Pakistanis dont know that, by your own logic.

Status: SERVED

The Anti Desi
January 15th, 2006, 03:39 PM
you better not be thinking of banning nationalism topics now too, then we really wont have anything to talk about in serious discussion. hehe :p
That would be for Geezer and Sameer to decide. Personally, I do want some kind of religious talks. But with the way it is now, I think we should give it a rest...and then maybe bring religion back later. The suspension on religious threads is indefinite.

xsilent_watersx
January 15th, 2006, 03:39 PM
That bullshit mate, according to fact all 3 wars were stalemates if you can class the Kangril conflict as a war, then you should go see the kill ratio, see how many Indians died ;) . Despite the fact the Indian army was 3 times stronger then the Pakistani army. Yeah you're 100% right terrorist states such as India should be abolished.

Even in the previous two wars the Pakistani air force owned India, hell Indian pilots where crashing in to mountains. Lol, what was funny and something I can never forget was when China said India has taken its sheep and China will declare war on India if they do not return them, lol the Indians were shitting themselves the Chinese said we want our sheep in 24/hrs, sometime later the Indians gathered all the sheep up and sprayed them lmao, because they were not the same color as the Chinese said was stolen by India. Anyway they sent some trucks full, and China sent them sheep to Pakistan, lol that was hilarious.idk where u get this bullshit from...

xsilent_watersx
January 15th, 2006, 03:40 PM
That would be for Geezer and Sameer to decide. Personally, I do want some kind of religious talks. But with the way it is now, I think we should give it a rest...and then maybe bring religion back later. The suspension on religious threads is indefinite.i agree. some people here will argue endlessly and pointlessly :no: and the sad thing is all of their statements they pull out of their ass :no:

gabroo_shakeen
January 15th, 2006, 06:07 PM
This is what I hate. Stupid Pakistan won't take steps to solve their own problems, instead whinning to other countries about it. What a waste of bloody time. They should instead by using that time to discuss with India, with whom the whole bloody problem is and take steps to normalize things in Kashmir and find a solution. Its non of saudi business what happens in Kashmir. India and pakistan dnt go medling in saudis affairs.

hey_jay37
January 15th, 2006, 09:18 PM
That would be for Geezer and Sameer to decide. Personally, I do want some kind of religious talks. But with the way it is now, I think we should give it a rest...and then maybe bring religion back later. The suspension on religious threads is indefinite.
yea, giving it a rest for a while is a good idea. it'll help get rid of the guys who start religious shit. then we can get back to it later.

Indian_Eyess
January 16th, 2006, 10:18 PM
This is what I hate. Stupid Pakistan won't take steps to solve their own problems, instead whinning to other countries about it. What a waste of bloody time. They should instead by using that time to discuss with India, with whom the whole bloody problem is and take steps to normalize things in Kashmir and find a solution. Its non of saudi business what happens in Kashmir. India and pakistan dnt go medling in saudis affairs.
Saudi Arabia has alot of money invested in that region, and is a major source of oil for India and Pakistan, so I can see how the Pakistanis are pulling the Saudis into this, plus I dont see how Pakistan has whined, at least in that article.

beedee
January 16th, 2006, 10:26 PM
guys, give it a rest, this topic is above you stations especially the "patriotic" ones here.

if you going to "discuss" dont be insulting one another....constructive arguements is where a solution is found.

you guys are the same as those in the respective governments hence the situation, you guys are no better.

bad_cheque
January 16th, 2006, 10:52 PM
guys, give it a rest, this topic is above you stations especially the "patriotic" ones here.

if you going to "discuss" dont be insulting one another....constructive arguements is where a solution is found.

you guys are the same as those in the respective governments hence the situation, you guys are no better.
Easier said here. But this is how it is here.

Welcome to RD.

Don't get addicted to this place.

Space-Cowboy
January 16th, 2006, 11:42 PM
That bullshit mate, according to fact all 3 wars were stalemates if you can class the Kangril conflict as a war, then you should go see the kill ratio, see how many Indians died ;) . Despite the fact the Indian army was 3 times stronger then the Pakistani army. Yeah you're 100% right terrorist states such as India should be abolished.

Even in the previous two wars the Pakistani air force owned India, hell Indian pilots where crashing in to mountains. Lol, what was funny and something I can never forget was when China said India has taken its sheep and China will declare war on India if they do not return them, lol the Indians were shitting themselves the Chinese said we want our sheep in 24/hrs, sometime later the Indians gathered all the sheep up and sprayed them lmao, because they were not the same color as the Chinese said was stolen by India. Anyway they sent some trucks full, and China sent them sheep to Pakistan, lol that was hilarious.


Did it hurt when you pulled this bullshit outta your ass?

bad_cheque
January 17th, 2006, 12:06 AM
Did it hurt when you pulled this bullshit outta your ass?
:rofl:

'The Sheep wars' by the Street_Scholar

To be published very soon.

Tells the story of how a bunch of Indian sheep converted into Chinese sheep to save the world from nuclear winter.

Space-Cowboy
January 17th, 2006, 12:43 AM
:rofl:

'The Sheep wars' by the Street_Scholar

To be published very soon.

Tells the story of how a bunch of Indian sheep converted into Chinese sheep to save the world from nuclear winter.


It's a true story don't you know? The Chosen sheep who's name has yet to be determined... travelled all the way to the Shaolin Monastary and trained in the most arcane Kung Fu fighting styles... then returned to India to kick some desi-sheep ass...

bad_cheque
January 17th, 2006, 12:49 AM
It's a true story don't you know? The Chosen sheep who's name has yet to be determined... travelled all the way to the Shaolin Monastary and trained in the most arcane Kung Fu fighting styles... then returned to India to kick some desi-sheep ass...
Were they cloned? :sarb:

Space-Cowboy
January 17th, 2006, 11:25 AM
Were they cloned? :sarb:


We'll never know.... :sarb: