PDA

View Full Version : which nation do you think is next on the war on terror


Leon 007
September 14th, 2005, 11:46 AM
and do you think what the west is doing right or wrong or are they creating more terrorists????

ilikecheese
September 14th, 2005, 11:54 AM
whatever nation has oil :roll:

Leon 007
September 14th, 2005, 11:55 AM
whatever nation has oil :roll:
lol true true

reaz
September 14th, 2005, 11:55 AM
the us is not going on a new war for a long while.. the troops are tired out..

Leon 007
September 14th, 2005, 11:58 AM
the us is not going on a new war for a long while.. the troops are tired out..
who do you think is next

dj XeNo
September 14th, 2005, 12:02 PM
either syria or iran is next. Most likely Iran. and I think it'll happen before the administration's term is over.

It's not really a war on terror....rather a war for terror.

Peace.

Muslima786
September 14th, 2005, 12:05 PM
most likely syria...and then eventually the whole mid-east

ShivaChrist
September 14th, 2005, 12:09 PM
and do you think what the west is doing right or wrong or are they creating more terrorists????

Yeah, I believe they are doing the right thing, and no, we've had this terrorist problem for a while now. They are creating more terrorists in the sense that the zealous clerics and whoever is helping these terrorist cells are recruiting more ignorant people into their jihad against the west - in that sense, you're right. Lots of ignorant people in the world.

Muslima786
September 14th, 2005, 12:13 PM
Yeah, I believe they are doing the right thing, and no, we've had this terrorist problem for a while now. They are creating more terrorists in the sense that the zealous clerics and whoever is helping these terrorist cells are recruiting more ignorant people into their jihad against the west - in that sense, you're right. Lots of ignorant people in the world.
right. :rolleyes:

Logical_Uzi
September 14th, 2005, 12:14 PM
IRAQ and SYRIA; HADITH

Abu Nadhrah says: "We were sitting in the company of Jabir bin Abdullah radhiyallahu anhu when he said: 'Soon the people of IRAQ will neither receive any food (grain) nor any money.'" We asked, "Why would such a thing happen?" He replied, "Because of the non-Arabs." (i.e they will prevent food from going into Iraq, in the form of "sanctions" to this day.) He then said: "Soon the people of Shaam (SYRIA) will neither receive any money nor grain." We asked as to why this would happen. He replied: "Because of the Romans (modern day US/UK empire)."

TheBride
September 14th, 2005, 12:16 PM
yes

Leon 007
September 14th, 2005, 12:16 PM
IRAQ and SYRIA; HADITH

Abu Nadhrah says: "We were sitting in the company of Jabir bin Abdullah radhiyallahu anhu when he said: 'Soon the people of IRAQ will neither receive any food (grain) nor any money.'" We asked, "Why would such a thing happen?" He replied, "Because of the non-Arabs." (i.e they will prevent food from going into Iraq, in the form of "sanctions" to this day.) He then said: "Soon the people of Shaam (SYRIA) will neither receive any money nor grain." We asked as to why this would happen. He replied: "Because of the Romans (modern day US/UK empire)."
interesting

americanmohit
September 14th, 2005, 12:32 PM
whatever nation has oil :roll:

agree with ya

Emerald99
September 14th, 2005, 12:32 PM
Canada, and we're going to OWN them.

chocolat
September 14th, 2005, 12:37 PM
Canada, and we're going to OWN them.

:kekeke:

reaz
September 14th, 2005, 12:40 PM
Yeah, I believe they are doing the right thing, and no, we've had this terrorist problem for a while now. They are creating more terrorists in the sense that the zealous clerics and whoever is helping these terrorist cells are recruiting more ignorant people into their jihad against the west - in that sense, you're right. Lots of ignorant people in the world.

it's a matter of perspective. your opinions appear ignorant to ppl on the other side of the world. all of us just spew the propaganda that we're fed through the media.

Upsidedowndesi
September 14th, 2005, 12:46 PM
whatever nation has oil :roll:
oh shit i back stocked sum gas when they said "gas shortage in GA". Does dat mean my garage is next :sarb: .....oh shit gotta hide the gas underground now.

HERCS
September 14th, 2005, 12:56 PM
all those dumb middle east nations...

FatGeezer
September 14th, 2005, 01:39 PM
and do you think what the west is doing right or wrong or are they creating more terrorists????

whoever has oil and is easy-peasy to beat...

hey_jay37
September 14th, 2005, 01:48 PM
Iran. Bush is too pussy to touch North Korea yet.

Z4K5T4R
September 14th, 2005, 01:51 PM
Leon 007 - Changed your name? Stop trying to hold a serious conversation doesn't suit you

desiboibristol
September 14th, 2005, 01:53 PM
Iran is next in the line...

Z4K5T4R
September 14th, 2005, 01:56 PM
ShivaChrist - By reading most of your posts seems like you don't know alot about what your Government is doing to this world. Terrorists don't wake up one day and decide to destroy others. There is always reasons to terrorism.

Ok so it's not going to stop just like that but at least on a safer level if these wars calm down then you won't have such big threats.

Z4K5T4R
September 14th, 2005, 01:57 PM
Oh and the answer tot he question is what Cheeseball said - whichever nation has oil!

Leon 007
September 14th, 2005, 05:43 PM
Iran is next in the line...
thats wat i think too

dopekhor
September 14th, 2005, 05:50 PM
Syria or Iran

ShivaChrist
September 14th, 2005, 05:55 PM
it's a matter of perspective. your opinions appear ignorant to ppl on the other side of the world. all of us just spew the propaganda that we're fed through the media.

*shrug*

We're not the ones strapping bombs to our chests and blowing innocent people up.

Leon 007
September 14th, 2005, 05:56 PM
*shrug*

We're not the ones strapping bombs to our chests and blowing innocent people up.
true instead you are dropping bombs from planes dipped in uranium ironic isnt it

ShivaChrist
September 14th, 2005, 06:02 PM
ShivaChrist - By reading most of your posts seems like you don't know alot about what your Government is doing to this world. Terrorists don't wake up one day and decide to destroy others. There is always reasons to terrorism.

Ok so it's not going to stop just like that but at least on a safer level if these wars calm down then you won't have such big threats.

I know what my government is doing, but there are two kinds of people... no, wait three kinds:

1) Those who agree with the US.
2) Those that don't agree with the US>
3) Those that don't give a shit either way.

Just because I fit into catagory #1 doesn't mean I'm labeled as ignorant of my government, just like you're entitled to your opinion as well. The world is full of ignorant people who are being spoon-fed religious jargon (the bad kind), and since their lives have either sucked or they are taught from birth to hate the west they make it their life's goal because they don't know any better. It's sad, really.

I never said our governement is completely innocent, but NO nation on earth is.

ShivaChrist
September 14th, 2005, 06:02 PM
true instead you are dropping bombs from planes dipped in uranium ironic isnt it

yes, which we're using to target civilians, right? /sarcasm off.

parkinlotpimp
September 14th, 2005, 06:02 PM
canada :rofl: oh man im too funny

Leon 007
September 14th, 2005, 06:06 PM
yes, which we're using to target civilians, right? /sarcasm off.
You have saddam so why you still in Iraq????

If you really only wanted saddam then you could have took him out and left there was no need for you to impose your way of life on them, if you were really bothered about Iraqis then you wouldnt have put saddaminto power, not supplied him with weapons and not put sanctions on them. The bottom line is they are suffering and you are not until it happens to us we wont know any difference. You dont put out fire with fire.

Adz4eva
September 14th, 2005, 06:22 PM
Well I thought it would be Iraq followed by Iran, back when they were bombing Afghanistan, Iraq has been done, so il stick with what I originally thought, Iran next.

Adz4eva
September 14th, 2005, 06:24 PM
yes, which we're using to target civilians, right? /sarcasm off.

Oh no, they just kill thousands upon thousands BY ACCIDENT!! :neutral: sorry mate that just doesnt cut it with me, they are the worst fucking terrorists on the planet, by a long way, simple as that, no bullshit excuses please.

Leon 007
September 15th, 2005, 04:56 PM
Oh no, they just kill thousands upon thousands BY ACCIDENT!! :neutral: sorry mate that just doesnt cut it with me, they are the worst fucking terrorists on the planet, by a long way, simple as that, no bullshit excuses please.
agreed

ShivaChrist
September 15th, 2005, 05:04 PM
Whatever, guys... you completely lost all your credibility by accusing the US of being terrorists. I hear Al Qaida is looking for spokespeople, maybe you two should try out.

Adz4eva
September 15th, 2005, 06:10 PM
Whatever, guys... you completely lost all your credibility by accusing the US of being terrorists. I hear Al Qaida is looking for spokespeople, maybe you two should try out.

You lost all credibility by trying to imply america kills thousands upon thousands off innocent civilians... by accident.

Nuclear
September 15th, 2005, 06:23 PM
Iran will probably be next if those Mullahs dont stop with their Nuclear program.

adren@line
September 15th, 2005, 09:53 PM
You lost all credibility by trying to imply america kills thousands upon thousands off innocent civilians... by accident.

The US Military does not target civilians in its campaigns. They measure success by the lowest possible number of civilian casualties.

Your jihad madrassa-monkey-heroes do not. They measure success by the highest rate of civilian casualtes.
That is the difference.

And lets not forget how many Muslims are killing other Muslims. Just take note of the Iran-Iraq war, or the constant Sunni-Shia conflicts that have existed for hundreds of years.

You guys should stop killing each other first before you bitch about getting your asses kicked by outsiders.

XprtNYYKY
September 15th, 2005, 09:54 PM
i say Ruwanda has been acting up.. we need to check' em' real quick.

Adz4eva
September 15th, 2005, 10:29 PM
The US Military does not target civilians in its campaigns. They measure success by the lowest possible number of civilian casualties.

Your jihad madrassa-monkey-heroes do not. They measure success by the highest rate of civilian casualtes.
That is the difference.

And lets not forget how many Muslims are killing other Muslims. Just take note of the Iran-Iraq war, or the constant Sunni-Shia conflicts that have existed for hundreds of years.

You guys should stop killing each other first before you bitch about getting your asses kicked by outsiders.

You being serious?

The people who flew planes into the twin towers, planted bombs on trains etc were targetting civilians, the people who drop bombs on villages and houses and market places also target civilians!!!

Can you really be that naive (or stupid) and think they kill how many thousands, by accident? They killed more civilians in afghanistan then the london bombings, 9-11 etc all put together, and thats not even getting onto iraq yet.

The only difference here is the so-called 'muslim terrorists' openly confess to targetting civilians (they justify it by claiming the people are not innocent civilians), the 'american terrorists' deny targetting any civilians ever, even though they keep killing thousands and thousands. Oops it was an accident, so that makes it ok does it? :rolleyes: Its already been proven the american govn (and uk) are nothing but liars.

Terrorists are terrorists, full stop, whether they have beards and fight on the front line, or wear suits and fight pressing buttons firing targets on a screen.

It doesnt matter how you 'measure success' if you go around invading other countries, illegally occupying other ppls land, killing innocent people, making weapons of mass destruction, selling weapons of mass destruction, USING weapons of mass destruction, please dont sit there telling me what a terrorist is.

RacingSoul
September 15th, 2005, 10:36 PM
Canada, and we're going to OWN them.

& here's our first official rd "Joke of the Day"

Leon 007
September 17th, 2005, 06:10 PM
You being serious?

The people who flew planes into the twin towers, planted bombs on trains etc were targetting civilians, the people who drop bombs on villages and houses and market places also target civilians!!!

Can you really be that naive (or stupid) and think they kill how many thousands, by accident? They killed more civilians in afghanistan then the london bombings, 9-11 etc all put together, and thats not even getting onto iraq yet.

The only difference here is the so-called 'muslim terrorists' openly confess to targetting civilians (they justify it by claiming the people are not innocent civilians), the 'american terrorists' deny targetting any civilians ever, even though they keep killing thousands and thousands. Oops it was an accident, so that makes it ok does it? :rolleyes: Its already been proven the american govn (and uk) are nothing but liars.

Terrorists are terrorists, full stop, whether they have beards and fight on the front line, or wear suits and fight pressing buttons firing targets on a screen.

It doesnt matter how you 'measure success' if you go around invading other countries, illegally occupying other ppls land, killing innocent people, making weapons of mass destruction, selling weapons of mass destruction, USING weapons of mass destruction, please dont sit there telling me what a terrorist is.
agreed